THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBDAS - A TEST OF THE ALMOST IDEAL AND ROTTERDAM MODELS

被引:59
作者
ALSTON, JM
CHALFANT, JA
机构
[1] Department of Agricultural Economics, University of California, Davis
关键词
ALMOST IDEAL DEMAND SYSTEM; DEMAND SYSTEMS; FLEXIBLE FUNCTIONAL FORMS; ROTTERDAM MODEL;
D O I
10.2307/1242914
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
During the past decade, the Linear Approximate (LA) Almost Ideal Demand System and the Rotterdam model have been adopted by agricultural economists as the demand systems of choice in most applications. The apparent explanation is that the two models are both (second-order) locally flexible and compatible with demand theory, they have identical data requirements and are equally parsimonious with respect to parameters, and both are linear in the parameters. While the two models are thus equally attractive in most respects, and indeed appear very similar in structure, they lead to different results in some applications. This article develops a test of each against the other. In an illustrative application to U.S. meat demand, the Almost Ideal model is rejected while the Rotterdam model is not.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 313
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
ALSTON JM, 1991, WESTERN J AGR ECON, V16, P36
[2]  
ALSTON JM, 1991, FEB AUSTR AGR EC SOC
[3]   ON THE FLEXIBILITY OF THE ROTTERDAM MODEL - A 1ST EMPIRICAL LOOK [J].
BARNETT, WA .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1984, 24 (03) :285-289
[4]   THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR THE ROTTERDAM MODEL [J].
BARNETT, WA .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1979, 46 (01) :109-130
[5]   CONSUMER DEMAND-FUNCTIONS UNDER CONDITIONS OF ALMOST ADDITIVE PREFERENCES [J].
BARTEN, AP .
ECONOMETRICA, 1964, 32 (1-2) :1-38
[6]  
BARTEN AP, 1992, IN PRESS EMPIRICAL E
[7]  
BRESTER GW, 1981, AM J AGR ECON, V73, P1182
[8]   ON THE FLEXIBILITY OF THE ROTTERDAM MODEL [J].
BYRON, RP .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1984, 24 (03) :273-283
[9]  
CAPPS O, 1991, WESTERN J AGR ECON, V16, P21
[10]   A GLOBALLY FLEXIBLE, ALMOST IDEAL DEMAND SYSTEM [J].
CHALFANT, JA .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1987, 5 (02) :233-242