ADVOCACY MEMBERSHIP, DESIGN GUIDELINES, AND PREDICTING PREFERENCES FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL DESIGNS

被引:25
作者
STAMPS, A [1 ]
MILLER, S [1 ]
机构
[1] CALIF POLYTECH STATE UNIV SAN LUIS OBISPO,DEPT ARCHITECTURE,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93407
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0013916593255004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Because advocacy planning and use of design guidelines are so prevalent, it is becoming important to ascertain how well each method can predict environmental quality. This article describes two experiments, covering 59 respondents and 76 environmental scenes, in which preferences of neighborhood groups and an architect's group were compared to each other, to responses of a random sample of a city's population, and to predictions based on design attributes of entourage, building interest, and building dominance. Results from both studies indicated that the attributes of building interest predicted the most preference variation. These findings suggest that the design guidelines' approach to visual amenity might be more efficacious than the advocacy approach.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 409
页数:43
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
ALP AV, 1984, CHALLENGE DIVERSITY, V15, P206
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1960, CONFLICT AROUSAL CUR, DOI DOI 10.1037/11164-000
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1977, SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
[4]  
Berlyne D., 1974, STUDIES NEW EXPT AES
[5]  
BUHYOFF GJ, 1978, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V6, P255
[6]  
*CIT SAN FANC, 1989, RES DES GUID
[7]  
*CIT SAN FRANC, 1988, 88316 NEIGHB CONS IN
[8]  
Cochran W.G., 1957, EXPT DESIGN, Vsecond
[9]  
COHEN J, 1988, STATISTICAL POWER AN
[10]  
COHEN J, 1983, APPLIED REGRESSION C