CEFTRIAXONE - A PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF ITS USE IN THE TREATMENT OF SERIOUS INFECTIONS

被引:15
作者
DAVIS, R
BRYSON, HM
机构
[1] Adis International Limited, Auckland, 41 Centorian Drive, Private Bag 6590 1, Mairangi Bay
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-199406030-00009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Ceftriaxone possesses a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity that includes the Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes commonly associated with serious infections. Its therapeutic efficacy is comparable to that of other third-generation cephalosporins and aminoglycoside-combination regimens. The most commonly reported adverse events with ceftriaxone are similar in incidence and severity to those reported with other third-generation cephalosporins. Notably, the drug has a favourable pharmacokinetic profile which allows once-daily administration. In comparative studies with other parenteral regimens requiring 3 to 6 daily doses, treatment with once-daily ceftriaxone reduced total antimicrobial drug costs (i.e. acquisition, preparation and administration costs) by 17 to 52%. Ceftriaxone was also more cost effective than ceftazidime and a variety of other antimicrobial treatment regimens (penicillins, cephalosporins, combination regimens) in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia or bronchopneumonia. This reflected lower drug and hospitalisation costs associated with a reduced length of hospital stay in ceftriaxone recipients. In noncomparative studies, ceftriaxone achieved considerable hospitalisation cost savings in patients with serious infections (mostly bone, joint, skin/skin structure infections), who were able to receive all or part of their antimicrobial therapy as outpatients. In one analysis which evaluated all direct and indirect costs (such as training programmes, transportation, time for visits and supplies) and benefits (such as hospitalisation cost savings, return to work or school, increased productivity) of outpatient ceftriaxone therapy, the overall benefit-cost ratio was approximately 5 : 1. The studies to date confirm that ceftriaxone is effective, well tolerated, convenient to administer and, when utilised appropriately, offers the potential for cost avoidance in patients with serious infections. Although additional well designed pharmacoeconomic analyses are needed to further evaluate its cost effectiveness, ceftriaxone should be considered an essential third-generation cephalosporin formulary representative in most clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 269
页数:21
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]  
Gladen H.E., Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of treatment with third generation cephalosporins, Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 15, pp. 99-105, (1992)
[2]  
Guglielmo B.J., Brooks G.F., Antimicrobial therapy. Cost-benefit considerations, Drugs, 38, (1989)
[3]  
Foran R.M., Brett J.L., Wulf P.H., Evaluating the cost impact of intravenous antibiotic dosing frequencies, Drug Intell Clin Pharm, 25, (1991)
[4]  
Pluidge R.J., Cost comparison of intravenous antibiotic administration, Med J Aust, 153, (1990)
[5]  
Tanner D.J., Cost containment of reconstituted parenteral antibiotics: personnel and supply costs associated with preparation.dispensing, and administration, Rev Infect Dis, 6, (1984)
[6]  
Tanner D.J., Nazarian M.Q., Cost containment associated with decreased parenteral antibiotic administration frequencies, AmJ Med, 148, (1984)
[7]  
Balinsky W., Nesbitt S., Cost-effectiveness of out patient antibiotics: a review of the literature, Am J Med, 87, (1989)
[8]  
Finkler S.A., The distinction between cost and charges, Ann Intern Med, 96, (1982)
[9]  
Chamberlain T.M., Lechman M.E., Groh M.J., COSt analysis of a home intravenous antibiotic program, Am J Hosp Pharm, 45, (1988)
[10]  
Statistical Abstract of the United States, (1993)