CONVENTIONAL 4-FIELD PELVIC RADIOTHERAPY TECHNIQUE WITHOUT CT TREATMENT PLANNING IN CANCER OF THE CERVIX - POTENTIAL GEOGRAPHIC MISS

被引:16
作者
KIM, RY
MCGINNIS, LS
SPENCER, SA
MEREDITH, RF
JENNELLE, RLS
SALTER, MM
机构
[1] Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, AL 35233
关键词
CERVICAL CANCER; RADIATION THERAPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; TREATMENT PLANNING;
D O I
10.1016/0167-8140(94)90043-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The advantage of 4-field radiation to the pelvis is the use of lateral ports which spare the small bowel anteriorly and a portion of the rectum posteriorly from radiation. However, guidelines for the lateral pelvic ports are poorly defined. This is a comparative analysis to determine adequate margins by correlating conventional lateral pelvic treatment portals with CT defined tumor volume. The study included 52 patients treated definitively for carcinoma of the uterine cervix between 1986 and 1991. The most common site of inadequate margin (less-than-or-equal-to 1.0 cm) was at the rectal block. The incidence of inadequate margin ranged from 39% to 50% and was independent of the stage of the disease except non-bulky stage IB disease. The next most common site was at the posterior border where frequency of inadequate margin for cervical tumor depended on stage with 8% of stage IB, 27% of stage IIB and 22% of stage IIIB/IVA disease. For the anterior border, an enlarged uterus was the only reason for inadequate margin rather than cervical tumor in 8% of stage IB, 18% of stage IIB, and 27% of stage IIIB/IVA disease. Without knowledge of precise tumor volume, the 4-field pelvic technique is potentially dangerous, risking underdosing of the tumor volume, For 4-field pelvic radiotherapy, we strongly recommend CT treatment planning.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 145
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING, COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND ENDOSONOGRAPHY IN THE LOCAL STAGING OF CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX [J].
COBBY, M ;
BROWNING, J ;
JONES, A ;
WHIPP, E ;
GODDARD, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1990, 63 (753) :673-679
[2]  
Fletcher G. H., 1980, TXB RADIOTHERAPY, P720
[3]   GYNECOLOGIC RADIOTHERAPY FIELDS DEFINED BY INTRAOPERATIVE MEASUREMENTS [J].
GREER, BE ;
KOH, WJ ;
FIGGE, DC ;
RUSSELL, AH ;
CAIN, JM ;
TAMIMI, HK .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1990, 38 (03) :421-424
[4]   COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY APPLIED TO RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING - TECHNIQUES AND RESULTS [J].
HOBDAY, P ;
HODSON, NJ ;
HUSBAND, J ;
PARKER, RP ;
MACDONALD, JS .
RADIOLOGY, 1979, 133 (02) :477-482
[5]  
HOSKINS WJ, 1980, CANC PRINCIPLES PRAC, V1, P720
[6]   RADIATION ALONE IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER OF THE UTERINE CERVIX - ANALYSIS OF PELVIC FAILURE AND DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP [J].
KIM, RY ;
TROTTI, A ;
WU, CJ ;
SOONG, SJ ;
SALTER, MM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 17 (05) :973-978
[7]  
MARCIAL VA, 1977, CANCER, V39, P945, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197702)39:2+<945::AID-CNCR2820390734>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-U
[9]  
MARCIAL VA, 1989, RAD ONCOLOGY RATIONA, P512
[10]   IMPACT OF DOSE IN OUTCOME OF IRRADIATION ALONE IN CARCINOMA OF THE UTERINE CERVIX - ANALYSIS OF 2 DIFFERENT METHODS [J].
PEREZ, CA ;
FOX, S ;
LOCKETT, MA ;
GRIGSBY, PW ;
CAMEL, HM ;
GALAKATOS, A ;
KAO, MS ;
WILLIAMSON, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (04) :885-898