GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX WITH NASOGASTRIC TUBES - EFFECT OF NASOGASTRIC TUBE SIZE

Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents results initially from reflux of stomach contents into the esophagus. Small-bore enteral feeding tubes are thought to result in less pulmonary aspiration and less reflux. We prospectively investigated the effect of nasogastric tube size upon gastroesophageal (GE) reflux in normal volunteers in a randomized crossover trial. Reflux was assessed by gastroesophageal scintiscanning, a radioisotopic technique that detects and quantitates GE reflux. A total of 11 subjects were studied three times: control, no nasogastric tube, small-bore (8F) nasogastric tube, and large-bore (14F) nasogastric tube. Reflux was assessed in each subject under each experimental condition by provocative testing in which abdominal pressure was increased from 0 to 100 mm Hg by 20-mm Hg increments with an abdominal pressure device. GE reflux indices were calculated for each measurement and the groups compared. A positive indicator of reflux was defined as a greater than or equal to 4% reflux index. Gastroesophageal reflux was not detected at any level of abdominal pressure regardless of the presence or size of a nasogastric tube. With maximum 100 mm Hg abdominal pressure, the reflux index was control, 1.75 +/- 0.45%; small-bore tube, 1.67 +/- 0.28%; and large-bore tube, 1.88 +/- 0.35% (NS). The reflux index was not different between small-bore and large-bore nasogastric tu bes. Our data suggest the size of a nasogastric tube is not an important determinant of GE reflux in normal subjects during short-term intubation. Large-bore tubes did not cause more reflux than smalt-bore tubes. The presence of a nasogastric tube did not cause reflux in normal subjects. These data suggest that factors other than the size of nasogastric tube are more important in GE reflux in normal subjects.