FEMORODISTAL BYPASS-GRAFTING - QUALITY-OF-LIFE AND SOCIOECONOMIC ASPECTS

被引:38
作者
PAASKE, WP
LAUSTSEN, J
机构
[1] Vascular Surgery Unit, Skejby Hospital, University of Aarhus
关键词
ARTERIAL SURGERY; ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; CRITICAL LEG ISCHEMIA; FEMORODISTAL BYPASS; SOCIOECONOMIC ASPECTS; QUALITY OF LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80117-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the socioeconomic aspects and the outcome of femorodistal bypass grafting operations in terms of general health state. Design: Prospective open clinical study. Material: 168 operations in 153 patients. Methods: A structured questionnaire was used to assess quality of life, and each patient was classified into a health state group defined by levels of disability and distress. Results: Before operation 23 patients were actively employed, 96 were old age pensioners, 29 received invalidity pension, and five were long term sick. 80% were living in their own home without ally help. Only 19 patients were actively employed at follow up, 12 of these had been working before the operation, and seven other patients had taken up paid work. About three-quarters of the patients could manage daily life without help after the operation, and 82% had no or only mild distress. There were significant changes with respect to physical mobility in all groups and emotional status in one group. In all other cases a significant change could not be shown. The median Quality of Life score at follow up tons 0.986 (n = 102, variance 0.022). The immediate costs were pound 1.5 million. Conclusions: The classification into disability and distress groups was informative, but the methods for assessment of the results of vascular surgery on quality of life, evaluation of patient satisfaction and of patients' expectations must be further developed.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 230
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Fraser, Quality-of-life measurements in surgical practice, Br J Surg, 80, pp. 163-169, (1993)
[2]  
Skillman, It can be fixed, but should it be?, Ann Surg, 218, pp. 713-714, (1993)
[3]  
Cox, Fitzpatrick, Fletcher, Gore, Spiegelhalter, Jones, Quality-of-life assessment Can we keep it simple?, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 155, pp. 353-393, (1992)
[4]  
Currie, Robson, Scott, Horrocks, Quality of life after aneurysm surgery, Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl, 74, pp. 269-273, (1992)
[5]  
Rosser, Watts, The measurement of hospital output, Int J Epidemiol, 1, pp. 361-368, (1972)
[6]  
Magee, Scott, Dunkley, Et al., Quality of life following surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm, Br J Surg, 79, pp. 1014-1016, (1992)
[7]  
Davies, Magee, Horrocks, Vein graft factors in the outcome of femorodistal bypass, Eur J Vasc Surg, 8, pp. 249-256, (1994)
[8]  
Houghton, Taylor, Thurlow, Rootes, McColl, Success rates for rehabilitation of vascular amputees: implications for preoperative assessment and amputation level, Br J Surg, 79, pp. 753-755, (1992)
[9]  
Troydl, Kusche, Vestweber, Eypasch, Koeppen, Bouillon, Quality of life an important endpoint both in surgical practice and research, Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, pp. 523-528, (1987)
[10]  
Hunt, McKenna, McEwen, Backett, Williams, Papp, A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study, J Epidemiol Comm Health, 34, pp. 281-286, (1980)