SELECTION OF OPTIMAL PROPHYLACTIC AMINOGLYCOSIDE DOSAGE IN CANCER-PATIENTS - POPULATION PHARMACOKINETIC APPROACHES

被引:5
作者
ORDOVAS, JP
RONCHERA, CL
POVEDA, JL
JIMENEZ, NV
LOPEZ, R
机构
[1] HOSP DR PESET,ORL SERV,E-46017 VALENCIA,SPAIN
[2] UNIV VALENCIA,DEPT PHARM & PHARMACEUT,VALENCIA,SPAIN
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2710.1994.tb00809.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
We report an alternative dose-finding approach for the selection of optimal prophylactic aminoglycoside dosage in specific (sub)populations of patients. Relative a priori utility of several intervals of gentamicin or tobramycin (AMG) peak and trough serum levels were assigned by a group of pharmacokinetics experts, assuming prophylactic administration for laryngectomy interventions. A group of 2 7 adult patients, with normal renal function, undergoing elective surgery for laryngeal problems and treated prophylactically with gentamicin (80 mg t.i.d.) or tobramycin (100 mg t.i.d.) was studied. Two blood samples (peak and trough) were drawn at steady-state for AMG assay. Three different methods, standard two-stage (STS), extended least-squares non-linear regression [MULTI(ELS)] and non-parametric expected maximization (NEPM), were used to estimate the pharmacokinetic (PK) population parameters. PK simulations were applied to estimate the AMG steady-state concentrations from the PK population parameters. From these data, relative utility values were calculated, allowing the selection of the optimal dosage schedule for this group of patients. There were no statistically significant differences between the PK population estimates as generated by the three methods. Using the STS estimates, the simulation of several dosages indicated that the optimal dosage is 170 mg every 8 h. Conversely, using the individual PK parameters and the mean AMG levels simulated from them, the dose with best relative utility is 130 mg every 8 h. This important difference points out the relevance of the use of relative utilities for the AMG serum concentrations in the selection of optimal a priori dosage. We propose the use of 120 mg every 8 h as the safer dose for our population. Further studies are needed to validate this proposal in patients similar to ours.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 56
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   AMIKACIN PHARMACOKINETICS IN PATIENTS RECEIVING HIGH-DOSE CANCER-CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
DAVIS, RL ;
LEHMANN, D ;
STIDLEY, CA ;
NEIDHART, J .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1991, 35 (05) :944-947
[2]   GENTAMICIN POPULATION PHARMACOKINETIC MODELS FOR LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS USING A NEW NONPARAMETRIC METHOD [J].
DODGE, WF ;
JELLIFFE, RW ;
RICHARDSON, J ;
MCCLEERY, RA ;
HOKANSON, JA ;
SNODGRASS, WR .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1991, 50 (01) :25-31
[3]   CEFOTAXIME IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICAL CANCER-SURGERY - LONG-TERM VERSUS SHORT-TERM ADMINISTRATION, RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
GEHANNO, P ;
MOISY, N ;
GUEDON, C .
DRUGS, 1988, 35 :111-115
[4]   PHARMACOKINETIC POPULATION PARAMETERS FOR AMINOGLYCOSIDES IN CHOLECYSTITIS PATIENTS [J].
GILL, MA ;
OKAMOTO, MP ;
NAKAHIRO, RK ;
CHIN, A ;
INAGAKI, K ;
SCLAR, DA .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1992, 14 (02) :107-111
[5]  
HIGA GM, 1987, CLIN PHARMACY, V6, P963
[6]  
IZQUIERDO I, 1991, S NEW STRATEGIES DRU
[7]   INDIVIDUALIZING GENTAMICIN DOSAGE REGIMENS - A COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF SELECTED MODELS, DATA FITTING METHODS AND MONITORING STRATEGIES [J].
JELLIFFE, RW ;
IGLESIAS, T ;
HURST, AK ;
FOO, KA ;
RODRIGUEZ, J .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1991, 21 (06) :461-478
[8]  
JELLIFFE RW, 1990, 904 U SO CAL SCH MED
[9]  
JELLIFFE RW, 1992, USER MANUAL USCASTER
[10]  
JELLIFFE RW, 1989, ASCP DM894 DM56 AM S