DETERMINATION OF PROSTATE VOLUME WITH TRANSRECTAL US FOR CANCER SCREENING .1. COMPARISON WITH PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ASSAYS

被引:40
作者
LITTRUP, PJ
KANE, RA
WILLIAMS, CR
EGGLIN, TK
LEE, F
TORPPEDERSEN, S
CHURCH, PA
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV, NEW ENGLAND DEACONESS HOSP, SCH MED, DEPT UROL, BOSTON, MA 02215 USA
[2] HARVARD UNIV, MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP, SCH MED, DEPT RADIOL, BOSTON, MA 02114 USA
[3] ST JOSEPH MERCY HOSP, DEPT RADIOL, ANN ARBOR, MI 48104 USA
关键词
CANCER SCREENING; PROSTATE; BIOPSY; HYPERPLASIA; NEOPLASMS; US STUDIES;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.178.2.1702894
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To investigate whether radiologists can objectively define a high-risk group for prostate cancer, the researchers measured gland volume and compared it with results of a screening blood test, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay. A total of 768 men, aged 55-71 years, were self-referred to two prostate cancer screening programs using transrectal ultrasound (US) and digital rectal examination. In patients with no evidence of cancer, statistically significant increases in mean PSA values were noted with increasing gland volume ranges (P < .05). PSA values in patients with cancer were more likely to exceed the volume-adjusted 95th percentile (mean + [1.65.standard deviation]) than those in patients with negative biopsy results (P < .005). Patients with PSA values above the volume-adjusted 95th percentile have an estimated risk for prostate cancer up to nine times that of the general screening population. The researchers conclude that knowledge of transrectal US gland volume and prostate-specific antigen assay type are important objective variables for future prostate cancer screening programs. The volume-adjusted 95th percentiles presented may help guide cost-effective management of current early detection efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 542
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
CHAN DW, 1987, CLIN CHEM, V33, P1916
[2]   CLINICAL-APPLICATION OF TRANS-RECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN THE SEARCH FOR PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
COONER, WH ;
MOSLEY, BR ;
RUTHERFORD, CL ;
BEARD, JH ;
POND, HS ;
BASS, RB ;
TERRY, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 139 (04) :758-761
[3]   TRANS-RECTAL ULTRASONIC VOLUME DETERMINATION OF THE PROSTATE - A PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE STUDY [J].
HASTAK, SM ;
GAMMELGAARD, J ;
HOLM, HH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1982, 127 (06) :1115-1118
[4]   DIFFERENCES IN VALUES OBTAINED WITH 2 ASSAYS OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN [J].
HORTIN, GL ;
BAHNSON, RR ;
DAFT, M ;
CHAN, KM ;
CATALONA, WJ ;
LADENSON, JH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 139 (04) :762-765
[5]  
KILLIAN CS, 1985, CANCER RES, V45, P886
[6]  
KILLIAN CS, 1986, J NATL CANCER I, V76, P179
[7]  
LANGE PH, 1989, J UROLOGY, V141, P873
[8]   HYPOECHOIC LESIONS OF THE PROSTATE - CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF TUMOR SIZE, DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION, AND PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN [J].
LEE, F ;
TORPPEDERSEN, S ;
LITTRUP, PJ ;
MCLEARY, RD ;
MCHUGH, TA ;
SMID, AP ;
STELLA, PJ ;
BORLAZA, GS .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (01) :29-32
[9]   PROSTATE-CANCER - COMPARISON OF TRANS-RECTAL US AND DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION FOR SCREENING [J].
LEE, F ;
LITTRUP, PJ ;
TORPPEDERSEN, ST ;
METTLIN, C ;
MCHUGH, TA ;
GRAY, JM ;
KUMASAKA, GH ;
MCLEARY, RD .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 168 (02) :389-394
[10]  
LITTRUP PJ, IN PRESS RADIOLOGY