COMPARISON OF THE CNV IN YOUNG AND OLD SUBJECTS - ITS RELATION TO MEMORY AND PERSONALITY

被引:23
作者
NAKAMURA, M
FUKUI, Y
KADOBAYASHI, I
KATO, N
机构
[1] Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1979年 / 46卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0013-4694(79)90207-4
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Memory and personality of 16 healthy, elderly human subjects (8 presenile and 8 senile) were assessed by the CLTR [consistent long-term retrieval] of selective reminding and the Maudsley Personality Inventory (MPI), Results were correlated with the CNV [contingent negative variation] recorded in the serial conditions of habituation, reinforcement, motor extinction (free attention), reinforcement and motor extinction (forced attention), and compared with those in 8 young subjects. The mean CNV amplitude under the reinforcement condition decreased prominently at ages over 65 yr. The mean reaction time (RT) was prolonged with aging and correlated with the CNV amplitude. The mean CNV amplitude under the motor extinction (free attention) condition decreased from the young to the presenile and senile ages. The mean CNV amplitudes under the habituation and motor extinction (forced attention) conditions did not show any definite changes among the groups. The CNV amplitude in the reinforcement had significant correlations with the CLTR value, extraversion and neuroticism scores of the MPI, while the RT had a significant correlation with the neuroticism score. Resistance against the motor extinction was enhanced with a decrease of the CLTR value and the extraversion score. The CNV in old people was apparently more influenced by senile changes in memory and personality than by chronological age.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 344
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   EVALUATING STORAGE, RETENTION, AND RETRIEVAL IN DISORDERED MEMORY AND LEARNING [J].
BUSCHKE, H ;
FULD, PA .
NEUROLOGY, 1974, 24 (11) :1019-1025
[2]  
FOZARD JL, 1975, MODERN PERSPECTIVES, P107
[3]  
HARKINS S W, 1976, Experimental Aging Research, V2, P409, DOI 10.1080/03610737608257999
[4]   MOTIVATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION [J].
IRWIN, DA ;
KNOTT, JR ;
MCADAM, DW ;
REBERT, CS .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1966, 21 (06) :538-&
[5]  
KARRER R, 1973, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V33, P39
[6]  
LISHMAN WA, 1971, RECENT DEV PSYCHOGER, P25
[7]   EFFECTS OF AGE ON CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION AND PREPARATORY SET IN A REACTION-TIME TASK [J].
LOVELESS, NE ;
SANFORD, AJ .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1974, 29 (01) :52-63
[8]   SURFACE-NEGATIVE SLOW-POTENTIAL SHIFT ASSOCIATED WITH CONDITIONING IN MAN [J].
LOW, MD ;
BORDA, RP ;
FROST, JD ;
KELLAWAY, P .
NEUROLOGY, 1966, 16 (08) :771-&
[9]   EFFECTS OF ATTENTION AND DISTRACTION ON CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION IN NORMAL AND NEUROTIC SUBJECTS [J].
MCCALLUM, WC ;
WALTER, WG .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1968, 25 (04) :319-&
[10]  
NAKAMURA M, 1975, Folia Psychiatrica et Neurologica Japonica, V29, P321