A COMPARISON OF THE SYSTEMIC BIOACTIVITY OF INHALED BUDESONIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE IN NORMAL SUBJECTS

被引:56
作者
GROVE, A
ALLAM, C
MCFARLANE, LC
MCPHATE, G
JACKSON, CM
LIPWORTH, BJ
机构
[1] UNIV DUNDEE,NINEWELLS HOSP & MED SCH,DEPT CLIN PHARMACOL,DUNDEE DD1 9SY,SCOTLAND
[2] UNIV ST ANDREWS,SCH BIOL & MED SCI,ST ANDREWS,FIFE,SCOTLAND
关键词
BUDESONIDE; FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE; CORTICOSTEROID; SYSTEMIC BIOAVAILABILITY; ASTHMA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2125.1994.tb04394.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
1 The aim of this study was to compare the systemic bioactivity of low and high doses of inhaled budesonide and fluticasone propionate given by respective dry powder inhaler devices. 2 A randomised, single blind cross-over design was used in nine healthy subjects who were given 800 mu g day(-1) of budesonide Turbohaler (B-800) for 1 week, followed by 1 week of 1600 mu g day(-1) (B-1600), or fluticasone Diskhaler 750 mu g day(-1) (F-750) for 1 week followed by 1 week of 1500 mu g day(-1) (F-1500). There was a 1 week washout between treatments with fluticasone or budesonide. A twice daily dosing regime was used and mouth-rinsing was employed to reduce gut bioavailability as well as to obviate local adverse effects. 3 Parameters of hypothalmic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis activity and bone metabolism were measured at baseline (B-0/F-0), at the end of each week of treatment and after the I week washout (F-0 or B-0). 4 Both fluticasone and budesonide significantly (P < 0.05) attenuated the post tetracosactrin serum cortisol at low and high doses whilst early morning cortisol was unchanged. No dose-response effect was observed with either drug, and there was no significant difference between treatment with fluticasone or budesonide. 5 Neither budesonide nor fluticasone produced significant suppression of plasma osteocalcin, although the higher doses of both drugs significantly reduced fasting urinary calcium levels. 6 Thus, whilst fluticasone and budesonide exhibited equivalent systemic bioactivity, when appropriate corrections are made for differences in lung deposition between the Turbohaler and Diskhaler, the systemic glucocorticoid activity of fluticasone may be greater than that of budesonide on a microgram equivalent basis. 7 The finding of significant HPA-axis suppression with low doses of fluticasone and budesonide despite the use of mouth rinsing would suggest that absorption across the lung-vascular bed is the major determinant of systemic adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 532
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
ANDERSSON N, 1994, THORAX, V49
[2]   A SENSITIVE RADIOIMMUNOASSAY, INCORPORATING SOLID-PHASE EXTRACTION, FOR FLUTICASONE 17-PROPIONATE IN PLASMA [J].
BAIN, BM ;
HARRISON, G ;
JENKINS, KD ;
PATEMAN, AJ ;
SHENOY, EVB .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 1993, 11 (07) :557-561
[3]  
BAKKE P, 1994, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V149, pA215
[4]  
BARNES NC, 1993, EUR RESPIR J, V6, P877
[5]   LUNG DEPOSITION OF BUDESONIDE INHALED VIA TURBUHALER(R) - A COMPARISON WITH TERBUTALINE SULFATE IN NORMAL SUBJECTS [J].
BORGSTROM, L ;
BONDESSON, E ;
MOREN, F ;
TROFAST, E ;
NEWMAN, SP .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1994, 7 (01) :69-73
[6]   SCREENING FOR HYPOTHALAMO-PITUITARY-ADRENAL AXIS SUPPRESSION IN ASTHMATICS TAKING HIGH-DOSE INHALED CORTICOSTEROIDS [J].
BROWN, PH ;
BLUNDELL, G ;
GREENING, AP ;
CROMPTON, GK .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 1991, 85 (06) :511-516
[7]   COMPARISON OF FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE WITH BECLOMETHASONE DIPROPIONATE IN MODERATE TO SEVERE ASTHMA TREATED FOR ONE-YEAR [J].
FABBRI, L ;
BURGE, PS ;
CROONENBORGH, L ;
WARLIES, F ;
WEEKE, B ;
CIACCIA, A ;
PARKER, C .
THORAX, 1993, 48 (08) :817-823
[8]  
GRAHNEN A, 1994, AM J RESP CIRT CAR S, V149, pA185
[9]   THE HUMAN PHARMACOLOGY OF FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE [J].
HARDING, SM .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 1990, 84 :25-29
[10]   ASSESSMENT OF SYSTEMIC EFFECTS OF INHALED GLUCOCORTICOSTEROIDS - COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF INHALED BUDESONIDE AND ORAL PREDNISOLONE ON ADRENAL-FUNCTION AND MARKERS OF BONE TURNOVER [J].
JENNINGS, BH ;
ANDERSSON, KE ;
JOHANSSON, SA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 40 (01) :77-82