CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION UNDER POSITIVE, NEGATIVE, AND NO CONTINGENCY BETWEEN CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED STIMULI

Using a conditioned suppression procedure, the effects of three contingent relationships between conditioned (CS) and unconditioned (US) stimuli were investigated. A traditional positive (if CS—then US) contingency suppressed response rate during the CS relative to responding during stimulus‐free minutes of the session. A negative (if CS—then no US) contingency resulted in suppressed responding during CS‐off minutes, and rate increases during the CS. A no‐contingency control procedure, during which CS and US were randomly related, almost totally suppressed responding throughout the session and showed no differential effects of the CS on response rate. An analysis of changes in response rate during the minute after US‐offset revealed acceleration under the no‐contingency condition and, to a somewhat lesser degree, under the negative contingency. Both conditioned suppression and non‐suppression are analyzed in terms of the temporal relationship between CS and US. 1969 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior