THE MINI-CEX (CLINICAL-EVALUATION EXERCISE) - A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION

被引:418
作者
NORCINI, JJ
BLANK, LL
ARNOLD, GK
KIMBALL, HR
机构
[1] American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
[2] American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-2675
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-123-10-199511150-00008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To gather preliminary data on the mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise), a device for assessing the clinical skills of residents. Design: Evaluation of residents by faculty members using the mini-CEX. Setting: 5 internal medicine training programs in Pennsylvania. Participants: 388 mini-CEX encounters involving 88 residents and 97 evaluators. Measurements: A mini-CEX encounter consists of a single faculty member observing a resident while that resident conducts a focused history and physical examination in any of several settings. After asking the resident for a diagnosis and treatment plan, the faculty member rates the resident and provides educational feedback. The encounters are intended to be short (about 20 minutes) and to occur as a routine part of training so that each resident can be evaluated on several occasions by different faculty members. Results: The encounters occurred in both inpatient and ambulatory settings and were longer than anticipated (median duration, 25 minutes). Residents saw either new or follow-up patients who collectively presented with a broad range of clinical problems. The median evaluator assessed two residents and was generally satisfied with the mini-CEX format; residents were even more satisfied with the format. The reproducibility of the mini-CEX is higher than that of the traditional CEX, and its measurement characteristics are similar to those of other test formats, such as standardized patients and standardized oral examinations. Conclusions: The mini-CEX assesses residents in a much broader range of clinical situations than the traditional CEX, has better reproducibility, and offers residents greater opportunity for observation and feedback by more than one faculty member and with more than one patient. On the other hand, the mini-CEX may be more difficult to administer because multiple encounters must be scheduled for each resident. Exclusive use of the mini-CEX also prevents residents from being observed while doing a complete history and physical examination. Given the promising results and measurement characteristics of the mini-CEX, however, the American Board of Internal Medicine encourages the use of this method in conjunction with or as an alternative to the traditional CEX.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 799
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
BRENNAN RL, 1983, ELEMENTS GENERALIZAB
[2]  
Crocker L., 1986, INTRO CLASSICAL MODE
[3]   RESIDENTS PERCEPTION OF EVALUATION PROCEDURES USED BY THEIR TRAINING-PROGRAM [J].
DAY, SC ;
GROSSO, LJ ;
NORCINI, JJ ;
BLANK, LL ;
SWANSON, DB ;
HORNE, MH .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 5 (05) :421-426
[4]  
Elstein A. S., 1978, MED PROBLEM SOLVING, DOI [10.1177/016224397800300337, DOI 10.1177/016224397800300337]
[5]   THE INTERRATER RELIABILITY AND INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF A CLINICAL-EVALUATION EXERCISE [J].
KROBOTH, FJ ;
HANUSA, BH ;
PARKER, S ;
COULEHAN, JL ;
KAPOOR, WN ;
BROWN, FH ;
KARPF, M ;
LEVEY, GS .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 7 (02) :174-179
[6]  
MAATSCH JL, 1986, NEWER DEV ASSESSING
[7]   HOW WELL DO INTERNAL-MEDICINE FACULTY MEMBERS EVALUATE THE CLINICAL SKILLS OF RESIDENTS [J].
NOEL, GL ;
HERBERS, JE ;
CAPLOW, MP ;
COOPER, GS ;
PANGARO, LN ;
HARVEY, J .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 117 (09) :757-765
[8]  
NORCINI JJ, 1987, J MED EDUC, V62, P457
[9]  
Shavelson, 1994, APPL MEAS EDUC, V7, P323, DOI [10.1207/s15324818ame0704_4, DOI 10.1207/S15324818AME0704_4]
[10]  
Van der Vleuten C., 1990, TEACH LEARN MED, V2, P58, DOI DOI 10.1080/10401339009539432