ASSESSING GROUP EFFECTS - COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS

被引:42
作者
FIREBAUGH, G
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1177/004912417900700402
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This article examines the relationship between two methods for detecting group effects in nonexperimental data: covariance analysis and contextual analysts. The examination shows that contextual effects are a special case of the group effect obtained in covariance analysis. This finding implies that (1) the group effect of covariance analysis provides an upper limit for contextual effects, (2) covariance analysis is more directly applicable in exploratory work, while contextual analysis is more directly applicable in causal analysis, and (3) both contextual and covariance analysis are required for a complete accounting of group effects. © 1979, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 395
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   ASSESSING SCHOOL EFFECTS - SOME IDENTITIES [J].
ALWIN, DF .
SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 1976, 49 (04) :294-303
[2]   BARTON,A COMMENTS ON HAUSERS CONTEXT AND CONSEX [J].
BARTON, AH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1970, 76 (03) :514-&
[3]   STRUCTURAL EFFECTS [J].
BLAU, PM .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1960, 25 (02) :178-193
[4]   INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY AND COLLECTIVE PROPERTY - A PROBLEM IN ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BOUDON, R .
REVUE FRANCAISE DE SOCIOLOGIE, 1963, 4 (03) :275-299
[5]  
BURKE PF, 1974, SOCIOL METHODOL, P145
[6]   ASSESSING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GROUPED AND INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS - ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES [J].
BURSTEIN, L .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1978, 7 (01) :5-28
[7]   A TECHNIQUE FOR ANALYZING THE EFFECTS OF GROUP COMPOSITION [J].
DAVIS, JA ;
SPAETH, JL ;
HUSON, C .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1961, 26 (02) :215-225
[8]  
DOGAN M, 1974, SOCIAL ECOLOGY
[9]  
Duncan B, 1972, SOCIOECONOMIC BACKGR
[10]  
Durkheim E, 1951, SUICIDE