A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF HIGH-DOSE CIPROFLOXACIN VERSUS AZLOCILLIN AND NETILMICIN IN THE EMPIRICAL THERAPY OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS

被引:32
作者
JOHNSON, PRE [1 ]
YIN, JAL [1 ]
TOOTH, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] MANCHESTER ROYAL INFIRM,DEPT MICROBIOL,MANCHESTER M13 9WL,LANCS,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jac/30.2.203
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
A prospective, randomized trial comparing monotherapy with high-dose ciprofloxacin versus a standard combination regimen of aziocillin and netilmicin in the empirical treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients was performed. One hundred and forty-six patient episodes were randomized, but ten (seven ciprofloxacin and three aziocilhin/netilmicin) were considered unevaluable for efficacy, and three episodes were withdrawn due to incorrect randomization or non-neutropenia. Of the remaining 133 episodes, infections resolved without modification of therapy in 25/66(38%) versus 28/67(42%) of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin/netilmicin treated groups respectively (P=0·72). Considering all randomized episodes, therapy was modified in 46/73(63%) episodes with ciprofloxacin and 39/70(56%) with aziocillin/netilmicin (P=0·40). Of 73 patient episodes randomized to ciprofloxacin, 25 (34%) received oral follow-on therapy after a median of three days of intravenous therapy. Infections were microbiologically documented in 31/73 (42%;) ciprofloxacin and 32/70 (46%) azlocillin/netilmicin, of which 8/27 (30%) and 14/31 (45%) of evaluable episodes resolved without modification of therapy respectively (P=0·28). Gram-positive organisms accounted for 78% of all organisms cultured with 36% coagulase-negative staphylococci. Bacteriological eradication was recorded in 18/24 (75%) and 26/29 (90%) evaluable patient episodes treated with ciprofloxacin and azlocillin/netilmicin respectively (P=0·27). Superinfections were seen in 14% of episodes in both groups, and subsequent infections in 12% ciprofloxacin and 14% aziocillin/netilmicin treated patients. Two patients (one ciprofloxacin and one azlocillin/netilmicin) died within 48 h of randomization, and a further 13 patients (four ciprofloxacin and nine azlocillin/netilmicin) died before resolution of neutropenia. Adverse events were recorded in 9% and 15% of ciprofloxacin and azlocilhin/netilmicin treated patients respectively, with skin rash (five ciprofloxacin and four azlocillin/netilmicin), nephrotoxicity (two azlocillin/netilmicin), abnormal liver function tests (two azlocillin/netihnicin), ototoxicity (one azlocilhin/netilmicin) and nausea (one ciprofloxacin) being the major events recorded. It was concluded that monotherapy with ciprofloxacin at this dosage is a safe alternative to combination therapy with azjocillin/netilmicin, and has the advantages of twice daily administration, iv and oral presentations, no cross allergy in β-lactam-hypersensitive patients, and no nephro or oto-toxicity. © 1992 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 214
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] SAFETY OF INTRAVENOUS CIPROFLOXACIN - A REVIEW
    ARCIERI, GM
    BECKER, N
    ESPOSITO, B
    GRIFFITH, E
    HEYD, A
    NEUMANN, C
    OBRIEN, B
    SCHACHT, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 87 (5A) : S92 - S97
  • [2] A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF CEFTAZIDIME AND CIPROFLOXACIN AS INITIAL EMPIRIC THERAPY IN NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS WITH FEVER
    BAYSTON, KF
    WANT, S
    COHEN, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 87 (5A) : S269 - S273
  • [3] TREATMENT OF SEPSIS IN PATIENTS WITH NEOPLASTIC DISEASES WITH INTRAVENOUS CIPROFLOXACIN
    BROWN, AE
    SMITH, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 87 (5A) : S266 - S268
  • [4] RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING CIPROFLOXACIN PLUS NETILMICIN VERSUS PIPERACILLIN PLUS NETILMICIN FOR EMPIRIC TREATMENT OF FEVER IN NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS
    CHAN, CC
    OPPENHEIM, BA
    ANDERSON, H
    SWINDELL, R
    SCARFFE, JH
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1989, 33 (01) : 87 - 91
  • [5] DEPAUW BE, 1990, 6TH P INT S INF IMM, pA116
  • [6] MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CIPROFLOXACIN PLUS AZLOCILLIN VERSUS CEFTAZIDIME PLUS AMIKACIN FOR EMPIRIC TREATMENT OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS
    FLAHERTY, JP
    WAITLEY, D
    EDLIN, B
    GEORGE, D
    ARNOW, P
    OKEEFE, P
    WEINSTEIN, RA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 87 (5A) : S278 - S282
  • [7] From the Immunocompromised host society, 1990, J INFECT DIS, V161, P397
  • [8] IS THERE A ROLE FOR MONOTHERAPY WITH BETA-LACTAM ANTIBIOTICS IN THE INITIAL EMPIRICAL MANAGEMENT OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC CANCER-PATIENTS
    HATHORN, JW
    PIZZO, PA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1986, 17 : 41 - 54
  • [9] EMPIRICAL ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY IN THE FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC CANCER-PATIENT - CLINICAL EFFICACY AND IMPACT OF MONOTHERAPY
    HATHORN, JW
    RUBIN, M
    PIZZO, PA
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1987, 31 (07) : 971 - 977
  • [10] HOOPER DC, 1989, REV INFECT DIS, V11, pS902