A NUMERICAL STUDY OF BOUNDARY-LAYER DYNAMICS IN A MOUNTAIN VALLEY .1. MODEL VALIDATION AND SENSITIVITY EXPERIMENTS

被引:36
作者
ENGER, L [1 ]
KORACIN, D [1 ]
YANG, XH [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV NEVADA,DESERT RES INST,RENO,NV 89557
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00712729
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
A higher order closure model is applied to simulate the dynamics in an area with a deep valley characterized by complex terrain in the southwestern US. The simulation results show generally good agreement with measured profiles at two locations within the valley. Both the measurements and the simulations indicate that the flow dynamics in the area are highly influenced by the topography and meandering of the valley, and can be resolved only by the full three-dimensional model code. The wind veering simulated over the range of the topographic elevations is often larger than 100 deg and in some cases as large as 180 deg, as a consequence of topographic forcing. In the case of an infinitely long valley, as is assumed in two-dimensional test simulations, a strong low-level jet occurs within the valley during stable conditions. The jet is mainly a consequence of the Coriolis effect. However, the jet development is significantly reduced due to asymmetric effects of the actual topography treated in the three-dimensional simulations. Tests with the two-dimensional nonhydrostatic version of the model show significant wave responses for a stable stratified flow over the valley. The structure resembles nonlinear mesoscale lee waves, which are intrinsically nonhydrostatic. However, considering the three-dimensional nature of this valley system, a better understanding and verification of the nonhydrostatic effects requires both a three-dimensional nonhydrostatic numerical model and an observational data set which is fully representative in all three dimensions.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 394
页数:38
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
ANDREN A, 1990, J APPL METEOROL, V29, P224, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0224:EOATCS>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   A TKE-DISSIPATION MODEL FOR THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY-LAYER [J].
ANDREN, A .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1991, 56 (03) :207-221
[4]  
ATWATER MA, 1974, DESCRIPTION GEN 3 DI, P67
[5]  
BHUMRALKAR CM, 1975, J APPL METEOROL, V14, P1246, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1975)014<1246:NEOTCO>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
Blackadar A. K., 1976, 3 S ATM TURB DIFF AI, P46
[8]  
CARPENTER KM, 1979, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V105, P629, DOI 10.1002/qj.49710544510
[9]   EFFICIENT PREDICTION OF GROUND SURFACE-TEMPERATURE AND MOISTURE, WITH INCLUSION OF A LAYER OF VEGETATION [J].
DEARDORFF, JW .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1978, 83 (NC4) :1889-1903
[10]   THE EFFECTS OF AMBIENT WINDS ON VALLEY DRAINAGE FLOWS [J].
DORAN, JC .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1991, 55 (1-2) :177-189