MINI-MENTAL-STATE-EXAM SCORES VARY WITH EDUCATION IN BLACKS AND WHITES

被引:242
作者
MURDEN, RA
MCRAE, TD
KANER, S
BUCKNAM, ME
机构
[1] NYU,SCH MED,NEW YORK,NY 10003
[2] SUNY,HLTH SCI CTR,BROOKLYN,NY
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01617.x
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Previous studies have suggested that education and race may affect performance on standardized mental status tests. In order to more clearly define these relationships, a prospective longitudinal study was devised to answer two questions: (1) whether race or level of education affects scores on the Mini-Mental State (MMS) exam in non-demented people and (2) what numerical cutpoints maximize the sensitivity and specificity of utilizing the MMS to help diagnose dementia in blacks of varying educational attainment. A total of 100 white and 258 black individuals, recruited from two city hospital primary care geriatric clinics, were evaluated and subsequently followed longitudinally over a 2 1/2 year period in order to assess accurately the presence or absence of dementia. In the non-demented, total MMS scores and performance on each item of the MMS were analyzed, revealing that people with an 8th grade or less education consistently had significantly (P < .01) worse results than the better educated (9th grade or better) on borough, attention items, recall of table and dog, copying, sentence writing, phrase repeating, and total score. Furthermore, a total of 25% of the lower education group had an MMS score in the 18-23 range, traditionally thought to suggest dementia. There were no consistently significant differences between blacks and whites of equal education. In the better educated groups, using a score of 23 or less to define dementia maximizes the sensitivity and specificity of using the MMS in this diagnosis at 93% and 100%, respectively. In the lower education group, using 17 or less to define dementia maximizes sensitivity and specificity at 81% and 100%, respectively. It is concluded that MMS results are affected by education but not by race, that only certain MMS items are educationally related and perhaps could be modified, and that on the unmodified MMS a score of 17 or less should be used as the cutpoint for suggesting the presence of dementia in the poorly educated.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 155
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   LIMITS OF THE MINI-MENTAL STATE AS A SCREENING-TEST FOR DEMENTIA AND DELIRIUM AMONG HOSPITAL PATIENTS [J].
ANTHONY, JC ;
LERESCHE, L ;
NIAZ, U ;
VONKORFF, MR ;
FOLSTEIN, MF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1982, 12 (02) :397-408
[2]  
AUERBACH VS, 1989, INT NEUROPSYCHOLOGIC
[3]   USE OF THE MINI-MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION IN A PROBABILITY SAMPLE OF A HISPANIC POPULATION [J].
BIRD, HR ;
CANINO, G ;
STIPEC, MR ;
SHROUT, P .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1987, 175 (12) :731-737
[4]   USE OF THE MINI-MENTAL-STATE-EXAMINATION (MMSE) IN A COMMUNITY POPULATION OF MIXED ETHNICITY - CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC ARTIFACTS [J].
ESCOBAR, JI ;
BURNAM, A ;
KARNO, M ;
FORSYTHE, A ;
LANDSVERK, J ;
GOLDING, JM .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1986, 174 (10) :607-614
[5]   PREDICTING INTELLECTUAL LEVEL FROM THE MINI-MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION [J].
FARBER, JF ;
SCHMITT, FA ;
LOGUE, PE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1988, 36 (06) :509-510
[6]   THE MEANING OF COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN THE ELDERLY [J].
FOLSTEIN, M ;
ANTHONY, JC ;
PARHAD, I ;
DUFFY, B ;
GRUENBERG, EM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1985, 33 (04) :228-235
[7]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198
[8]  
HOLZER CE, 1984, RES COMMUNITY MENTAL, V0004
[9]   EDUCATIONAL-LEVEL DIFFERENCES ON THE MINI-MENTAL STATE - THE ROLE OF TEST BIAS [J].
JORM, AF ;
SCOTT, R ;
HENDERSON, AS ;
KAY, DWK .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1988, 18 (03) :727-731
[10]   PATTERNS OF MENTAL-DISORDERS AMONG THE ELDERLY RESIDENTS OF EASTERN BALTIMORE [J].
KRAMER, M ;
GERMAN, PS ;
ANTHONY, JC ;
VONKORFF, M ;
SKINNER, EA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1985, 33 (04) :236-245