THE SUPPORT PROGNOSTIC MODEL - OBJECTIVE ESTIMATES OF SURVIVAL FOR SERIOUSLY ILL HOSPITALIZED ADULTS

被引:460
作者
KNAUS, WA
HARRELL, FE
LYNN, J
GOLDMAN, L
PHILLIPS, RS
CONNERS, AF
DAWSON, NV
FULKERSON, WJ
CALIFF, RM
DESBIENS, N
LAYDE, P
OYE, RK
BELLAMY, PE
HAKIM, RB
WAGNER, DP
机构
[1] GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIV, MED CTR, WASHINGTON, DC 20037 USA
[2] DUKE UNIV, MED CTR, DIV BIOMETRY, CTR HEART, DURHAM, NC 27705 USA
[3] DARTMOUTH COLL, HITCHCOCK MED CTR, SCH MED, CTR EVALUAT CLIN SCI, HANOVER, NH 03755 USA
[4] BETH ISRAEL HOSP, BOSTON, MA 02215 USA
[5] CLEVELAND METROHLTH MED CTR, CLEVELAND, OH 44109 USA
[6] MARSHFIELD MED RES FDN, MARSHFIELD, WI 54449 USA
[7] MARSHFIELD CLIN FDN MED RES & EDUC, MARSHFIELD, WI 54449 USA
[8] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES, SCH MED, DEPT MED, LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 USA
[9] BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP, BOSTON, MA 02215 USA
[10] DUKE UNIV, DUKE S HOSP, MED CTR, DURHAM, NC 27710 USA
[11] MED COLL WISCONSIN, DEPT FAMILY & COMMUN MED, MILWAUKEE, WI 53226 USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-122-3-199502010-00007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop and validate a prognostic model that estimates survival over a 180-day period for seriously ill hospitalized adults (phase I of SUPPORT [Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments]) and to compare this model's predictions with those of an existing prognostic system and with physicians' independent estimates (SUPPORT phase II). Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: 5 tertiary care academic centers in the United States. Participants: 4301 hospitalized adults were selected for phase I according to diagnosis and severity of illness; 4028 patients were evaluated from phase II. Measurements: A survival model was developed using the following predictor variables: diagnosis, age, number of days in the hospital before study entry, presence of cancer, neurologic function, and 11 physiologic measures recorded on day 3 after study entry. Physicians were interviewed on day 3. Patients were followed for survival for 180 days after study entry. Results: The area under the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve for prediction of surviving 180 days was 0.79 in phase 1, 0.78 in the phase II independent validation, and 0.78 when the acute physiology score from the APACHE (Acute Physiology, Age, Chronic Health Evaluation) III prognostic scoring system was substituted for the SUPPORT physiology score. For phase II patients, the SUPPORT model had equal discrimination and slightly improved calibration compared with physicians' estimates. Combining the SUPPORT model with physicians' estimates improved both predictive accuracy (ROC curve area = 0.82) and the ability to identify patients with high probabilities of survival or death. Conclusions: A limited amount of readily available clinical information can provide a foundation for longterm survival estimates that are as accurate as physicians' estimates. The best survival estimates combine an objective prognosis with a physician's clinical estimate.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 203
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   INFORMED CONSENT, CANCER, AND TRUTH IN PROGNOSIS [J].
ANNAS, GJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (03) :223-225
[2]   PNEUMOCOCCAL BACTEREMIA WITH ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO BACTEREMIC PNEUMOCOCCAL PNEUMONIA [J].
AUSTRIAN, R ;
GOLD, J .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1964, 60 (05) :759-+
[3]   AMERICAN-COLLEGE OF CHEST PHYSICIANS SOCIETY OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE CONSENSUS CONFERENCE - DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS [J].
BONE, RC ;
BALK, RA ;
CERRA, FB ;
DELLINGER, RP ;
FEIN, AM ;
KNAUS, WA ;
SCHEIN, RMH ;
SIBBALD, WJ ;
ABRAMS, JH ;
BERNARD, GR ;
BIONDI, JW ;
CALVIN, JE ;
DEMLING, R ;
FAHEY, PJ ;
FISHER, CJ ;
FRANKLIN, C ;
GORELICK, KJ ;
KELLEY, MA ;
MAKI, DG ;
MARSHALL, JC ;
MERRILL, WW ;
PRIBBLE, JP ;
RACKOW, EC ;
RODELL, TC ;
SHEAGREN, JN ;
SILVER, M ;
SPRUNG, CL ;
STRAUBE, RC ;
TOBIN, MJ ;
TRENHOLME, GM ;
WAGNER, DP ;
WEBB, CD ;
WHERRY, JC ;
WIEDEMANN, HP ;
WORTEL, CH .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1992, 20 (06) :864-874
[4]   PREDICTION OF OUTCOME FROM CRITICAL ILLNESS - A COMPARISON OF CLINICAL JUDGMENT WITH A PREDICTION RULE [J].
BRANNEN, AL ;
GODFREY, LJ ;
GOETTER, WE .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 149 (05) :1083-1086
[5]  
CALIFF RM, 1982, CONGESTIVE HEART FAI, P31
[6]   MORALS AND MORALISM IN THE DEBATE OVER EUTHANASIA AND ASSISTED SUICIDE [J].
CASSEL, CK ;
MEIER, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 323 (11) :750-752
[7]   DECISION-MAKING IN SUPPORT - INTRODUCTION [J].
CONNORS, AF ;
DAWSON, NV ;
LYNN, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 :S47-S49
[8]   ERRORS AND BIAS IN USING PREDICTIVE SCORING SYSTEMS [J].
COWEN, JS ;
KELLEY, MA .
CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 1994, 10 (01) :53-72
[9]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[10]   RELIABILITY OF A MEASURE OF SEVERITY OF ILLNESS - ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY OF CHRONIC HEALTH EVALUATION .2. [J].
DAMIANO, AM ;
BERGNER, M ;
DRAPER, EA ;
KNAUS, WA ;
WAGNER, DP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (02) :93-101