EFFECT OF SETTING ON THE REINFORCING AND SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF ETHANOL IN SOCIAL DRINKERS

被引:79
作者
DOTY, P
DEWIT, H
机构
[1] Department of Psychiatry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, 60637, IL
关键词
ETHANOL; REINFORCING EFFECTS; CHOICE; SUBJECTIVE DRUG EFFECTS; SETTING; SOCIAL; ISOLATED; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1007/BF02245245
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The reinforcing and subjective effects of two doses of ethanol [0.5 g/kg (LOW) and 0.8 g/kg (HIGH)] were evaluated under two conditions, a social condition (SOC), in which subjects were tested with two Or three other subjects, and a socially isolated condition (ISO), in which subjects were tested alone. Forty-one social drinkers participated in a double-blind, seven-session choice procedure. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups: SOC-LOW, SOC-HIGH, ISO-LOW, or ISO-HIGH. On the first four sessions, subjects sampled ethanol (0.5 or 0.8 g/kg) on two occasions and placebo on the other two occasions. On the three remaining sessions, subjects selected and consumed whichever of the two previously sampled substances they preferred. The number of sessions on which they chose ethanol was the primary measure of the reinforcing effects of ethanol. Standardized self-report questionnaires and a psychomotor test were used to measure subjective and objective drug effects. Subjects in the SOC condition chose ethanol over placebo on significantly more sessions than subjects in the ISO condition. Ethanol produced positive subjective effects (e.g., increased ratings of drug liking and euphoria) for subjects in the SOC condition, but for subjects in the ISO condition, it produced apparently negative effects (e.g., increased ratings of dysphoria). These results extend previous reports that the behavioral effects of ethanol depend upon the social condition in which it is consumed.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 27
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 1987, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V3rd
[2]   MODELING INFLUENCES IN SOCIAL DRINKING - EXPERIMENTAL ANALOGUE [J].
CAUDILL, BD ;
MARLATT, GA .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 43 (03) :405-415
[3]  
DELPORTO JA, 1984, RES COMMUN PSYCH PSY, V9, P201
[4]  
DEROGATIS LR, 1983, SCL90R MANUAL, V2
[5]   ASSESSMENT OF ABUSE LIABILITY OF STIMULANT-DRUGS IN HUMANS - A METHODOLOGICAL SURVEY [J].
FOLTIN, RW ;
FISCHMAN, MW .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1991, 28 (01) :3-48
[6]   EFFECT OF ETHANOL SELF-ADMINISTRATION ON CHOICE BEHAVIOR - MONEY VS SOCIALIZING [J].
GRIFFITHS, R ;
BIGELOW, G ;
LIEBSON, I .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1975, 3 (03) :443-446
[7]   DEVELOPMENT OF THE ADDICTION RESEARCH-CENTER INVENTORY (ARCI) - SELECTION OF ITEMS THAT ARE SENSITIVE TO THE EFFECTS OF VARIOUS DRUGS [J].
HAERTZEN, CA ;
HILL, HE ;
BELLEVILLE, RE .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA, 1963, 4 (03) :155-166
[8]   EFFECT OF D-AMPHETAMINE, SECOBARBITAL, AND MARIJUANA ON CHOICE BEHAVIOR - SOCIAL VERSUS NONSOCIAL OPTIONS [J].
HEISHMAN, SJ ;
STITZER, ML .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 99 (02) :156-162
[9]   EFFECTS OF D-AMPHETAMINE ON CHOICE OF SOCIAL VERSUS MONETARY REINFORCEMENT - A DISCRETE-TRIAL TEST [J].
HIGGINS, ST ;
HUGHES, JR ;
BICKEL, WK .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1989, 34 (02) :297-301
[10]   TIME ALLOCATION IN A CONCURRENT SCHEDULE OF SOCIAL-INTERACTION AND MONETARY REINFORCEMENT - EFFECTS OF D-AMPHETAMINE [J].
HIGGINS, ST ;
STITZER, ML .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1988, 31 (01) :227-231