THE EFFECTIVENESS OF 2 SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAMS FOR USE IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL

被引:72
作者
SLAMA, K [1 ]
REDMAN, S [1 ]
PERKINS, J [1 ]
REID, ALA [1 ]
SANSONFISHER, RW [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV NEWCASTLE,FAC MED,NEWCASTLE,NSW 2308,AUSTRALIA
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.300.6741.1707
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate a structured, behavioural change, smoking cessation intervention designed for use within general practice. Design: Randomised controlled clinical trial. Setting: General practices in Newcastle, Australia. Patients: 311 Patients identified as smokers by a screening question were enrolled in the study. Of these, 101 were assigned to a structured behavioural change programme, 104 to a simple advice programme adapted from previous research, and 106 to a control group. No significant differences were found between groups for demographic and smoking related variables before the study. Interventions: Patients in the simple advice group received a brief statement of advice from the general practitioner as well as three pamphlets; those in the structured intervention group were given strategies which included attitude and behavioural change programmes as well as techniques to aid compliance. The amount of smoking in all groups was assessed by self reports with validation by measurement of salivary concentrations. Main outcome measure: Significant increase in cessation rates. Conclusions: Significant differences between controls and the structured behavioural change group were found at the one month follow up, but only for self reported abstinence. The simple advice programme did not produce any significant differences over the control group. General practitioner evaluation of the structured programme highlighted difficulties in relation to the duration of the intervention. Overall the structured programme in its present form did not appear to be an effective programme for use within general practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1707 / 1709
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] BENOWITZ NL, 1988, NEW ENGL J MED, V20, P1318
  • [2] CHU FZ, 1981, J FAM PRACTICE, V12, P657
  • [3] MEASURING GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS ATTITUDES TOWARDS MEDICAL-CARE
    COCKBURN, J
    KILLER, D
    CAMPBELL, E
    SANSONFISHER, RW
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 1987, 4 (03) : 192 - 199
  • [4] GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS DETECTION OF PATIENTS SMOKING STATUS
    DICKINSON, JA
    WIGGERS, J
    LEEDER, SR
    SANSONFISHER, RW
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1989, 150 (08) : 420 - 426
  • [5] FLEMING DM, 1984, J R COLL GEN PRACT, V31, P615
  • [6] COMPARISON OF TESTS USED TO DISTINGUISH SMOKERS FROM NONSMOKERS
    JARVIS, MJ
    TUNSTALLPEDOE, H
    FEYERABEND, C
    VESEY, C
    SALOOJEE, Y
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1987, 77 (11) : 1435 - 1438
  • [7] 3-YEAR EVALUATION OF A PROGRAM BY GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS TO HELP PATIENTS TO STOP SMOKING
    RICHMOND, RL
    AUSTIN, A
    WEBSTER, IW
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 292 (6523): : 803 - 806
  • [8] EFFECT OF GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS ADVICE AGAINST SMOKING
    RUSSELL, MAH
    WILSON, C
    TAYLOR, C
    BAKER, CD
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1979, 2 (6184) : 231 - 235
  • [9] DISTRICT PROGRAM TO REDUCE SMOKING - EFFECT OF CLINIC SUPPORTED BRIEF INTERVENTION BY GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS
    RUSSELL, MAH
    STAPLETON, JA
    JACKSON, PH
    HAJEK, P
    BELCHER, M
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 295 (6608) : 1240 - 1244
  • [10] STEWART PJ, 1982, CAN MED ASSOC J, V126, P1051