2 PROCESSES IN PERCEPTUAL LEARNING

[1] AMES A, 1951, PSYCHOL MONOGR, V65

[2] CANTRIL H, 1950, WHY MANS EXPERIENCE

[3] Gibson J.J., 1950, PERCEPTION VISUAL WO

[4] HOFFMAN EL, 1953, THESIS PRINCETON U

[5] Ittelson W.H., 1952, AMES DEMONSTRATIONS

[6] THE CONSTANCIES IN PERCEPTUAL THEORY [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1951, 58 (04) : 285 - 294

[7] ITTELSON WH, 1952, HUMAN BEHAV T POINT, P41

[8] THE SIZE DISTANCE INVARIANCE HYPOTHESIS [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1953, 60 (04) : 223 - 231

[9] KILPATRICK FP, 1952, HUMAN BEHAVIOR TRANS, P1

[10] KILPATRICK FP, 1952, HUMAN BEHAVIOR TRANS, P153

[1] AMES A, 1951, PSYCHOL MONOGR, V65

[2] CANTRIL H, 1950, WHY MANS EXPERIENCE

[3] Gibson J.J., 1950, PERCEPTION VISUAL WO

[4] HOFFMAN EL, 1953, THESIS PRINCETON U

[5] Ittelson W.H., 1952, AMES DEMONSTRATIONS

[6] THE CONSTANCIES IN PERCEPTUAL THEORY [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1951, 58 (04) : 285 - 294

[7] ITTELSON WH, 1952, HUMAN BEHAV T POINT, P41

[8] THE SIZE DISTANCE INVARIANCE HYPOTHESIS [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1953, 60 (04) : 223 - 231

[9] KILPATRICK FP, 1952, HUMAN BEHAVIOR TRANS, P1

[10] KILPATRICK FP, 1952, HUMAN BEHAVIOR TRANS, P153