BAND-STRUCTURE CALCULATION OF DISPERSION AND ANISOTROPY IN [--]CHI(3) FOR 3RD-HARMONIC GENERATION IN SI, GE, AND GAAS

被引:149
作者
MOSS, DJ [1 ]
GHAHRAMANI, E [1 ]
SIPE, JE [1 ]
VANDRIEL, HM [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TORONTO,DEPT PHYS,TORONTO M5S 1A7,ONTARIO,CANADA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW B | 1990年 / 41卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevB.41.1542
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We perform a full band-structure calculation of the dispersion, anisotropy, and magnitude of the nonlinear response (3) for optical third-harmonic generation in Si, Ge, and GaAs, using both an empirical tight-binding (ETB) and a semiab initio band-structure technique. The calculation is performed with use of standard perturbation theory within the random-phase approximation and neglect of local-field corrections, with the minimal-coupling interaction Hamiltonian. The sign of (3)(0) is positive, independent of the tight-binding approximation, and in agreement with experimental results from the literature. We find that intraband contributions to (3) are small, in contrast with earlier results obtained by using the dipole interaction Hamiltonian. While both expressions for (3) yield a positive (3)(0), the minimal-coupling expression is dominated by the interband response, whereas the dipole expression is dominated by the intraband response. The resulting anisotropy in (3) obtained from the ETB bands for all materials agrees with the experiment better than other calculations to date at frequencies far below the optical band gap. For silicon, the anisotropy calculated from the ETB band structure also agrees well with recent measurements on the dispersion of the anisotropy at frequencies comparable to the optical band gap. The values of (3)(0) obtained from the ETB bands overestimate the experimental values by factors of 2 (for Si and GaAs) to 5 (for Ge), while the results obtained from the semiab initio bands underestimate the experimental values by a factor of approximately 2 (for Si) and 7 (for Ge and GaAs). While the (ETB) results for Si and GaAs are approximately within experimental error, the difference between the results from the two band-structure calculations reflects the high sensitivity of (3) to the details of the energy bands and wave functions. © 1990 The American Physical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1542 / 1560
页数:19
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   TIGHT-BINDING BONDING ORBITAL MODEL FOR 3RD-ORDER NON-LINEAR OPTICAL SUSCEPTIBILITIES IN GROUP-IV CRYSTALS [J].
ARYA, K ;
JHA, SS .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1979, 20 (04) :1611-1616
[2]   ENERGY-BAND THEORY OF SECOND-ORDER NONLINEAR OPTICAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF CRYSTALS OF ZINCBLENDE SYMMETRY [J].
ASPNES, DE .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1972, 6 (12) :4648-4659
[3]   ELECTRICAL FIELD EFFECTS ON DIELECTRIC CONSTANT OF SOLIDS [J].
ASPNES, DE .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1967, 153 (03) :972-+
[4]   INTERBAND DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES OF SOLIDS IN AN ELECTRIC FIELD [J].
ASPNES, DE ;
HANDLER, P ;
BLOSSEY, DF .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1968, 166 (03) :921-&
[5]  
Bell M.I., 1971, NBS US SPEC PUBL, V323, P757
[6]   THIRD-HARMONIC GENERATION IN ABSORBING MEDIA OF CUBIC OR ISOTROPIC SYMMETRY [J].
BURNS, WK ;
BLOEMBERGEN, N .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B-SOLID STATE, 1971, 4 (10) :3437-+
[8]   NONLOCAL PSEUDOPOTENTIAL CALCULATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC-STRUCTURE OF 11 DIAMOND AND ZINCBLENDE SEMICONDUCTORS [J].
CHELIKOWSKY, JR ;
COHEN, ML .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1976, 14 (02) :556-582
[9]   THIRD-ORDER OPTICAL SUSCEPTIBILITIES IN 4-4 AND 3-5 SEMICONDUCTORS [J].
FLYTZANIS, C .
PHYSICS LETTERS A, 1970, A 31 (05) :273-+
[10]  
Flytzanis C, 1975, QUANTUM ELECT TREATI, P9