INTERACTION OF PRE-ATTACK AND INDUCED MONOTERPENE CONCENTRATIONS IN HOST CONIFER DEFENSE AGAINST BARK BEETLE FUNGAL COMPLEXES

被引:214
作者
RAFFA, KF [1 ]
SMALLEY, EB [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV WISCONSIN,DEPT PLANT PATHOL,MADISON,WI 53706
关键词
INDUCED RESISTANCE; PLANT INSECT INTERACTIONS; INSECT FUNGAL INTERACTIONS; TERPENES; BARK BEETLES;
D O I
10.1007/BF00329795
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Two pine species (Pinus resinosa, P. banksiana) responded to inoculation with fungi carried by bark beetles by rapidly increasing monoterpene concentrations at the entry site. Changes in total monoterpenes were more pronounced than changes in proportionate compositions. The extent and rate of host response was affected by fungal species, the viability of the inoculum, and host tree species. In general, host responses were highest to fungi that are phytopathogenic and consistently associated with the major bark beetles in the study region. Simple mechanical wounding cannot account for the observed allelochemical changes, as aseptic inoculations elicited only minor reactions. Similarly, inoculation with autoclaved inviable fungi generally elicited intermediate responses, suggesting that both structural and metabolic fungal properties are important. Responses by jack pine, P. banksiana, were generally more rapid and variable than those of red pine, P. resinosa. Dose-toxicity experiments with synthetic compounds demonstrated that monoterpene concentrations present in vivo only a few days after simulated attack are lethal to most beetles. Constitutive (pre-attack) monoterpene levels can also exert some toxicity. Because bark beetles engage in pheromone-mediated mass attacks that can deplete host defenses, constitutive monoterpene levels, while a necessary early phase of successful plant defense, appear insufficient by themselves. Such interactions between constitutive and induced defense chemistry may be important considerations when evaluating general theories of plant defense.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 295
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Berryman A.A., Resistance of conifers to invasion by bark beetle-fungal associations, BioScience, 22, pp. 598-602, (1972)
[2]  
Borden J.H., Aggregation pheromones, Bark beetles in North American conifers, pp. 74-139, (1982)
[3]  
Chapin I.F.S., Bryant J.P., Fox J.F., Lack of induced chemical defense in juvenile Alaskan woody plants in response to simulated browsing, Oecologia, 67, pp. 457-459, (1985)
[4]  
Cheniclet C., Bernard-Dagan C., Pauly G., Terpene biosynthesis under pathological conditions, Mechanisms of woody plant defenses against insects: search for pattern, pp. 117-130, (1988)
[5]  
Christiansen E., Ceratocystis polonica inoculated in Norway spruce: blue-staining in relation to inoculum density resinosis and tree growth, Forest Pathology, 15, pp. 160-167, (1985)
[6]  
Christiansen E., Ericsson A., Starch reserves in Picea abies in relation to defence reaction against a bark beetle transmitted blue-stain fungus Ceratocystis polonica, Can J For Res, 16, pp. 78-83, (1986)
[7]  
Christiansen E., Horntvedt R., Combined Ips/Ceratocystis attack on Norway spruce and defensive mechanisms of the trees, Z angew Entomol, 96, pp. 110-117, (1983)
[8]  
Cobb F.W., Krstic K., Zavarin E., Barber H.W., Inhibitory effects of volatile oleoresin components on Fomes annosus and four Ceratocystis species, Phytopathology, 58, pp. 1327-1335, (1968)
[9]  
Cook S.P., Hain H.P., Detensive mechanisms of loblolly and shortleaf pine against attack by southern pine beetle Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman and its fungal associate Ceratocystis minor (Hedgecock) Hunt, J Chem Ecol, 12, pp. 1397-1406, (1986)
[10]  
Coyne J.F., Lott L.H., Toxicity of substances in pine oleoresin to southern pine beetle, J Ga Entomol Soc, 11, pp. 301-305, (1976)