COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF STATOCYSTS IN THE PLATYHELMINTHES AND THE XENOTURBELLIDA

The general fine-structural organization of statocysts in Catenulida, Nemertodermatida, Acoela, Proseriata, Lurus (Dalyellioida), and Xenoturbella are summarized. In lithophorous (statocyst-bearing) members of the Catenulida, the statocysts exhibit a few parietal cells and one or several movable statoliths within a spacious intracapsular cavity. Statocysts in the Nemertodermatida have several parietal cells and two lithocytes, each equipped with one statolith, whereas those of the other acoelomorphan taxon, the Acoela, always have two parietal cells and one movable lithocyte. The statocysts of lithophorous members of the Proseriata represent more sophisticated systems: each has two clusters of accessory cells in addition to several parietal cells and a voluminous lithocyte in which the statolith is movable. In catenulids and proseriates, processes of outer neurons penetrate the capsule of the statocyst, whereas such innervations have not been found in the Nemertodermatida and Acoela. I conclude that the different types of statocysts have evolved independently within the Plathelminthes. Xenoturbella displays an intraepidermal statocyst with many monociliary parietal cells and several mobile cells ('lithocytes') within the central cavity of the statocyst. Each of these mobile cells carries a statolith-like structure and one prominent cilium. The statocyst of Xenoturbella does not correspond to any type of plathelminth statocyst.