THE EFFECT OF SMEAR LAYER UPON THE CORONAL LEAKAGE OF GUTTA-PERCHA ROOT FILLINGS AND A GLASS IONOMER SEALER

被引:50
作者
SAUNDERS, WP
SAUNDERS, EM
机构
[1] Department of Conservative Dentistry, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School, Glasgow
[2] Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dundee Dental Hospital, Dundee
关键词
CORONAL LEAKAGE; GLASS IONOMER; ROOT CANAL SEALER; SMEAR LAYER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2591.1992.tb01157.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
The effect of the removal of the smear layer on coronal leakage of root fillings was studied using two sealer cements. Sixty single-rooted teeth with mature apices were prepared chemomechanically using a modified double-flared technique with non-cutting tipped files and copious irrigation with 2% sodium hypochlorite. The teeth were randomly allocated to four groups of 15 teeth each. Two groups were treated with 40% citric acid to remove the smear layer. Two groups of teeth, one with and one without smear layer, were filled by lateral condensation of gutta-percha with either Tubliseal or a resin-based glass ionomer, Vitrebond. The teeth were stored for 1 week, thermocycled, and the extent of coronal leakage determined for each group after immersion in Indian ink for 90 h. The teeth were demineralized, dehydrated and immersed in methyl salicylate which rendered them transparent. Linear measurement of dye penetration was recorded. The mean depth (+/-SD) of leakage for the groups in which the smear layer was left intact was 4.26+/-1.53 mm and 6.83+/-1.65 mm for the Vitrebond and Tubliseal, respectively. When the smear layer had been removed, the mean depth of leakage for the Vitrebond group was 1.13+/-0.29 mm, and 3.72+/-1.23 mm for the Tubliseal group. There was a statistically significant difference in leakage between the groups (P < 0.001). With both sealers, those teeth in which the smear layer had been removed showed less leakage than the specimens in which the smear layer was left intact (P < 0.001). The Vitrebond specimens leaked less than the teeth that were root filled using Tubliseal, both when the smear layer was intact and when it was absent (P < 0.001).
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 249
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Cergneux M., Ciucchi B., Dietschi J.M., Holz J., The influence of the smear layer on the sealing ability of canal obturation, International Endodontic Journal, 20, pp. 228-232, (1987)
[2]
Coren S., Burns R.C., Pathways of the Pulp, 183, (1987)
[3]
Czonstkowsky M., Wilson E.G., Holstein F.A., The smear layer in endodontics, Dental Clinics of North America, 34, pp. 13-25, (1990)
[4]
Hovland E.J., Dumsha T.C., Leakage evaluation in vitro of the root canal sealer cement Sealapex, International Endodontic Journal, 18, pp. 179-182, (1985)
[5]
Kennedy W.A., Walker W.A., Gouch R.W., Smear layer removal effects on apical leakage, Journal of Endodontics, 12, pp. 21-27, (1986)
[6]
McComb D., Smith D.C., A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures, Journal of Endodontics, 1, pp. 238-242, (1975)
[7]
Mader C.L., Baumgartner J.C., Peters D.D., Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smeared layer on root canal walls, Journal of Endodontics, 10, pp. 499-503, (1984)
[8]
Madison S., Wilcox L.R., An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part III. In vivo study, Journal of Endodontics, 14, pp. 455-458, (1988)
[9]
Madison S., Swanson K., Chiles S.A., An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part II. Sealer types, Journal of Endodontics, 13, pp. 109-112, (1987)
[10]
Meryon S.D., Jakeman K.J., Browne R.M., Penetration in vitro of human and ferret dentine by three bacterial species in relation to their potential role in pulpal inflammation, International Endodontic Journal, 19, pp. 213-220, (1986)