TYPICAL INTELLECTUAL ENGAGEMENT AND PERSONALITY - REPLY

被引:56
作者
ACKERMAN, PL
GOFF, M
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.150
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
T. Rocklin (1994) examined the relations between our (M. Goff & P. L. Ackerman, 1992) measure of Typical Intellectual Engagement (TIE) and a personality test measure of Openness. We examine Rocklin's arguments in the context of three themes: philosophical issues, TIE and Openness from a facet perspective, and the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma. Although Rocklin raised important issues about these constructs, we demonstrate that measures of TIE and Openness, although significantly related, are theoretically and empirically distinguishable.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 153
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
ACKERMAN PL, IN PRESS CURRENT TOP, V4
[2]  
ACKERMAN PL, 1993, DETERMINANTS LEARNIN
[3]   FACTS, FACTORS, AND ARTIFACTS - THE QUEST FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL MEANING [J].
COAN, RW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1964, 71 (02) :123-140
[4]  
COHEN IB, 1960, BIRTH NEW PHYSICS
[5]  
Costa P. T., 1985, NEO PERSONALITY INVE
[6]   4 WAYS 5 FACTORS ARE BASIC [J].
COSTA, PT ;
MCCRAE, RR .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1992, 13 (06) :653-665
[7]  
Cronbach L. J., 1990, ESSENTIALS PSYCHOL T
[8]   4 WAYS 5 FACTORS ARE NOT BASIC [J].
EYSENCK, HJ .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1992, 13 (06) :667-673
[9]   PERSONALITY INTELLIGENCE RELATIONS - ASSESSMENT OF TYPICAL INTELLECTUAL ENGAGEMENT [J].
GOFF, M ;
ACKERMAN, PL .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (04) :537-552
[10]  
GOFF M, 1992, EMPIRICAL FINDINGS T