External and internal accountability of financial services suppliers: current paradoxes in managing expectations and experience

被引:14
作者
O'Loughlin, Deirdre [1 ]
Szmigin, Isabelle [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Limerick, Kemmy Business Sch, Dept Management & Mkt, Limerick, Ireland
[2] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Business Sch, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
Financial supplier accountability; expectations vs. experience; Irish banking sector;
D O I
10.1080/09652540500083008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Reflecting recent European and International trends, the Irish financial services sector has witnessed phenomenal technological and competitive developments, affecting consumer decision-making and behaviour and forcing financial suppliers to re-assess their approach to setting customer expectations and assessing the consumer experience. This study, using a purposive sample of financial services managers and experts, shows suppliers increasingly struggling to practice external accountability to their customers and internal accountability to their employees. In terms of external accountability, suppliers identified numerous brand-related issues and challenges, including the increasing lack of brand differentiation and the difficulties in creating meaningful brand images, which are posing significant difficulties in creating positive and appealing customer expectations. In relation to internal accountability, suppliers highlighted the challenges associated with empowering their employees to provide a personal and superior service and meeting the evolving requirements of an increasingly diverse customer base. Recommendations are made in relation to the incorporation of consumer research, internal marketing and technology in order to provide a banking experience which facilitates supplier commitment and accountability to both customers and employees.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 147
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Customer loyalty and complex services - The impact of corporate image on quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty for customers with varying degrees of service expertise [J].
Andreassen, TW ;
Lindestad, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SERVICE INDUSTRY MANAGEMENT, 1998, 9 (01) :7-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, MANAGE DECIS, DOI DOI 10.1108/00251749110139106
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, J STRATEGIC MARKETIN
[4]  
Ballantyne D., 2000, INT J BANK MARK, V18, P274
[5]  
Berry L. L., 1991, MARKETING SERVICES
[6]  
Bitner M. J., 1995, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V23, P246, DOI DOI 10.1177/009207039502300403
[7]  
Black N., 2002, INT J BANK MARK, V20, P161, DOI [DOI 10.1108/02652320210432945, 10.1108/02652320210432945]
[8]  
Bock T, 2002, INT J MARKET RES, V44, P235
[9]  
Broderick A. J., 2001, P EUR MARK AC C BERG
[10]  
Burgess R. G., 2003, FIELD RES, P177