RESULTS AND EFFECT OF REFUSAL RECONTACT IN A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY

被引:12
作者
HOLT, VL
DALING, JR
STERGACHIS, A
VOIGT, LF
WEISS, NS
机构
[1] Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington
[2] Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences
[3] Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Center for Health Studies
[4] Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle
关键词
BIAS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES;
D O I
10.1097/00001648-199109000-00012
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In a population-based study of ectopic pregnancy, a card-back system of initial subject contact yielded a positive response from 85.1% of potential cases and 65.0% of potential controls. We subsequently recontacted by telephone potential controls who had declined to participate and offered them $10 compensation for participation. We recontacted 205 of the 330 control women who had refused to participate. Twenty-eight were found to be ineligible, and 75.7% of the remaining 177 agreed to participate on recontact. The additional 125 women were not recontacted, 9 because of firm initial refusals and 116 because the study ended before contact could be sought or made. Controls who initially declined to participate but subsequently agreed differed from those who initially agreed on a number of demographic and reproductive characteristics, and estimates of ectopic pregnancy risk associated with induced abortion and tubal sterilization changed slightly with the inclusion of initial nonparticipants. We conclude that use of a card-back system of subject contact yields a low level of positive response among reproductive-aged women and that many initial nonparticipants can be converted into participants by personal contact and the offer of compensation.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 379
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Mueller B.A., McTieman A., Dating J.R., Level of response in epidemiologic studies using the card-back system to contact subjects, Am J Pub Health, 76, pp. 1331-1332, (1986)
  • [2] McTiernan A., Weiss N.S., Daling J.R., Bias resulting from using the card-back system to contact patients in an epidemiologic study, Am Jpub Health, 76, pp. 71-73, (1986)
  • [3] Kelsey J.L., Privacy and confidentiality in epidemiological research involving patients, IRB: Review of Human Subjects Research, 3, pp. 1-4
  • [4] Holt V.L., Daling J.R., Voigt L.F., McKnight B., Stergachis A., Chu J., Weiss N.S., Induced abortion and the risk of subsequent ectopic pregnancy, Am J Pub Health, 79, pp. 1234-1238, (1989)
  • [5] Breslow N.E., Day N.E., Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, (1980)
  • [6] Holt V.L., Chu J., Daling J.R., Stergachis A., Weiss N.S., Tubal sterilization and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: A case-control study, JAMA, 266, pp. 242-246, (1991)
  • [7] Little R.E., Davis A.K., Effectiveness of various methods of contact and reimbursement on response rates of pregnant women to a mail questionnaire, Amj Epidemiol, 120, pp. 161-163, (1984)
  • [8] A study of the effect of remuneration upon response in the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
  • [9] Criqui M.H., Barrett-Connor E., Austin M., Differences between respondents and non-respondents in a population-based cardiovascular disease study, Am J Epidemiol, 108, pp. 367-372, (1978)
  • [10] Doll R., Hill A.B., Mortality in relation to smoking: Ten years’ observations of British doctors, Br Med J, 1, pp. 1399-1410, (1964)