SOLUTE RELEASE MECHANISMS FROM CONFINED SEDIMENT CORES IN STIRRED BENTHIC CHAMBERS AND FLUME FLOWS

被引:168
作者
HUETTEL, M [1 ]
GUST, G [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV S FLORIDA, DEPT MARINE SCI, ST PETERSBURG, FL 33701 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3354/meps082187
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Interfacial solute fluxes from sediment cores enclosed in stirred chambers were compared with solute fluxes from a reference core inserted in a flume simulating in situ conditions with unidirectional boundary-layer flow. Utilizing Rhodamine-WT dye as conservative solute, and quantifying the hydrodynamic driving forces by hot film anemometry and a highly sensitive wet/wet differential pressure transducer, the pathways of solutes in chamber- and flume-confined cores are identified. The critical parameter limiting confined-core flux techniques is the sediment permeability, with equivalency between experimental techniques and natural, smooth bottoms found for impermeable sediments only, where bottom stress and Schmidt number act as the controlling parameters permitting use of diffusive laws. In contrast, pressure gradients, induced by edge and sidewall effects in cores under unidirectional flow and by circular flow patterns in stirred chambers, being ineffective for impermeable sediments, generate non-negligible advective porewater flows in permeable sediments. For fine sandy sediment (phi = 2.2; permeability K = 15 Darcy, D), stirred-chamber circular flow enhanced solute release up to 6-fold over that from the reference core exposed to 2-dimensional flow, with intruding supernatant water reaching up to 8-fold deeper into the porespace. Consequences of these advective exchange processes include release of anoxic porewater and increased oxygen uptake in permeable cores, with shifts in redox isolines affecting biological and geochemical processes in the sediment. Results suggest that chamber fluxes are both site- and device-dependent and cannot be automatically equated with in situ fluxes.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 197
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
ALLER R.C., 1982, ANIMAL SEDIMENT RELA, P53, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-1317-6_2
[2]   EFFECTS OF THE MARINE DEPOSIT-FEEDERS HETEROMASTUS-FILIFORMIS (POLYCHAETA), MACOMA-BALTHICA (BIVALVIA), AND TELLINA-TEXANA (BIVALVIA) ON AVERAGED SEDIMENTARY SOLUTE TRANSPORT, REACTION-RATES, AND MICROBIAL DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
ALLER, RC ;
YINGST, JY .
JOURNAL OF MARINE RESEARCH, 1985, 43 (03) :615-645
[3]   FORMS OF PHOSPHORUS AND ITS ACCUMULATION IN COASTAL SEDIMENTS OF KIELER BUCHT [J].
BALZER, W .
OPHELIA, 1986, 26 :19-35
[4]  
BERELSON WM, 1987, MAR TECHNOL SOC J, V21, P26
[5]  
Berner R. A., 1976, BENTHIC BOUNDARY LAY, P33, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-8747-7_3, 10.1007/978-1-4615-8747-7_3]
[6]  
BEYER WH, 1968, HDB TABLES PROBABILI, P307
[7]   NITROGEN CYCLING IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF SEDIMENTS FROM DANISH WATERS [J].
BLACKBURN, TH ;
HENRIKSEN, K .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1983, 28 (03) :477-493
[8]   GROUNDWATER SEEPAGE INTO GREAT SOUTH BAY, NEW-YORK [J].
BOKUNIEWICZ, H .
ESTUARINE AND COASTAL MARINE SCIENCE, 1980, 10 (04) :437-444
[9]  
Boudreau B. P., 1982, DYNAMIC ENV OCEAN FL, P115
[10]  
BOWKER AH, 1972, ENG STATISTICS, P242