BIOMETRICAL METHODS FOR TESTING DOSE EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL STIMULI IN LABORATORY STUDIES

被引:7
作者
PIEGORSCH, WW
机构
[1] Department of Statistics, Univ. of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
关键词
DISCRETE DATA; DOSE RESPONSE; OVERDISPERSION; QUANTAL RESPONSE; SIGNIFICANCE TEST; TREND TEST;
D O I
10.1002/env.3170040408
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the areas of toxicology and environmental biology, the damaging effects of environmental chemicals or other stimuli on biological systems are often studied in controlled laboratory experiments. These usually involve animal and microbial systems. Data from such experiments are analysed via various statistical approaches, depending on the nature of the endpoint and aspects of the particular assay under study. Major endpoints of interest include carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, and teratogenicity. When the environmental stimulus is administered over a range of doses, it is of interest to estimate and/or test features of the dose response. In some instances, variance heterogeneity and overdispersion are present, and adjustments to the statistical methods are required. Herein, such methods for assessing dose response for the major endpoints noted above are discussed, with emphasis directed at testing for an increasing dose response.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 505
页数:23
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Bailer A.J., Portier C.J., Effects of treatment‐induced mortality and tumorinduced mortality on tests for carcinogenicity in small samples, Biometrics, 44, pp. 417-431, (1988)
[2]  
Bernardo J.M., Algorithm AS103. The digamma function, Applied Statistics, 25, pp. 315-317, (1976)
[3]  
Bernstein L., Kaldor J., McCann J., Pike M.C., An empirical approach to the statistical analysis of mutagenesis data from the Salmonella test, Mutation Research, 97, pp. 267-281, (1982)
[4]  
Boos D.D., Analysis of dose–reponse data in the presence of extrabinomial variation, Applied Statistics, 42, pp. 173-184, (1993)
[5]  
Breslow N., Extra‐Poisson variability in log‐linear models, Applied Statistics, 33, pp. 38-44, (1984)
[6]  
Carr G.J., Portier C.J., An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose–response models to quantal‐response developmental toxicology data, Biometrics, 49, pp. 779-792, (1993)
[7]  
Collings B.J., Margolin B.H., Oehlert G.W., Analysis for binomial data, with applications to the fluctuations test for mutagenicity, Biometrics, 37, pp. 775-794, (1981)
[8]  
Cox D.R., Regression models and life tables, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, pp. 187-220, (1972)
[9]  
Dinse G.E., Testing for a trend in tumour prevalence rates. I: Nonlethal tumours, Biometrics, 41, pp. 751-779, (1985)
[10]  
Dinse G.E., A prevalence analysis that adjusts for survival and tumour lethality, Applied Statistics, 37, pp. 435-445, (1988)