SURGICAL-TREATMENT OF SEVERE ISTHMIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS IN ADOLESCENTS - REDUCTION OR FUSION INSITU

被引:111
作者
POUSSA, M [1 ]
SCHLENZKA, D [1 ]
SEITSALO, S [1 ]
YLIKOSKI, M [1 ]
HURRI, H [1 ]
OSTERMAN, K [1 ]
机构
[1] INVALID FDN,ORTHOPAED HOSP,HELSINKI,FINLAND
关键词
Adolescents; Fusion in siiu; Redaction; Severe spondylolisthesis;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199306000-00014
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Twenty-two adolescent patients with severe (more than 50%) slip were surgically treated. Eleven were reduced with Magerl/Dick transpedicular screw devices and fused posteriorly from L4 to S1, and 2 weeks later anteriorly L5-S1; the other 11 were fused in situ L4-S1 (6 patients) or L5-S1 (5 patients) using a circumferential (6 patients), anterior (4 patients) or posterolateral (1 patient) technique without instrumentation. The two groups were comparable as to age at operation, age at follow-up, follow-up time, and preoperative radiologic measurement of the slip, lumbosacral kyphosis, and clinical findings. The mean follow-up times were 56.5 and 59.8 months, respectively. In the reduction group an improvement in the slip of 36.1 percentage points was achieved as compared with 7.7 percentage points in the in situ-fusion group. The sagittal rotation angle improved by 11 in the reduction group and worsened by 2.8 in the in situ-fusion group. There were no differences between the groups in the functional tests or clinical findings concerning pain. Subjective assessment was good in both groups at follow-up; that is, the pain had disappeared. Mean operation time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly higher in the reduction group. Reduction procedures were also associated with a higher number of complications and reoperations. No neurologic complications, however, occurred in the reduction group. Based on this study, in situ fusions are to be preferred in adolescents with severe spondylolisthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:894 / 901
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Balderston R., Bradford D., Technique for achievement and maintenance of reduction for severe spondylolisthesis using spinous process traction wiring and external fixation of the pelvis, Spine, 10, pp. 376-382, (1985)
[2]  
Boxall D., Bradford D.S., Winter R.B., Moe J.H., Management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents, J Bone Joint Surg, 61A, pp. 479-495, (1979)
[3]  
Bradford D.S., Gotfried Y., Staged salvage reconstruction of grade-IV and V spondylolisthesis, J Bone Joint Surg, 69A, pp. 191-202, (1987)
[4]  
Bradford D.S., Boachie-Adjei O., Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis by anterior and posterior reduction and stabilization, J Bone Joint Surg, 72A, pp. 1060-1066, (1990)
[5]  
Dandy D.J., Shannon M.J., Lumbosacral subluxation (Group 1 Spondylolisthesis), J Bone Joint Surg, 53B, pp. 578-595, (1971)
[6]  
Dick W.T., Schnebel B., Severe spondylolisthesis. Reduction and internal fixation, Clin Orthop, 232, pp. 70-79, (1988)
[7]  
De Wald R.L., Faut M.M., Taddonio R.F., Neuwirth M.G., Severe Lumbosacral spondylolisthesis in adolescents and children, J Bone Joint Surg, 63A, pp. 619-626, (1981)
[8]  
Fairbank J., Couper J., Davies J.B., O'Brien J.B., The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire, Physiotherapy, 66, pp. 271-273, (1980)
[9]  
Frennered A.K., Danielson B.I., Nachemson A.L., Nordwall A.B., Midterm Follow-up of young patients fused in situ for spondylolisthesis, Spine, 16, pp. 409-416, (1991)
[10]  
Johnson J.R., Kirwan E., The long term results of fusion in situ for severe spondylolisthesis, J Bone Joint Surg, 65B, pp. 43-46, (1983)