RETRENCHMENT IN THE 1980S - THE POLITICS OF PRESTIGE AND GENDER

被引:57
作者
SLAUGHTER, S
机构
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2959928
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Data from AAUP retrenchment cases reported from 1980-90 show that resources were not simply being cut back but being reallocated within the university and that new resources were being concentrated on already resource-rich areas. Faculty in fields able to position themselves close to the market and locate themselves in broad political discourse on productivity were generally not cut, whereas those who were unwilling or unable to participate in the discourse of the market, productivity, and competitiveness were cut. A disproportionate number of fields with majority female student bodies were cut.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 282
页数:33
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
*AM ASS U PROF, 1990, AM ASS U PROF POL DO
[2]  
*AM COUNC ED, 1992, CAMP TRENDS 1992
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1983, NAT RISK IMP ED REF
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1984, INNER CIRCLE
[5]  
Apple M., 1979, IDEOLOGY CURRICULUM
[6]   MEASURING CENTRALITY - A NOTE ON HACKMAN RESOURCE-ALLOCATION THEORY [J].
ASHAR, H ;
SHAPIRO, JZ .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1988, 33 (02) :275-283
[7]   ARE RETRENCHMENT DECISIONS RATIONAL - THE ROLE OF INFORMATION IN TIMES OF BUDGETARY STRESS [J].
ASHAR, H ;
SHAPIRO, JZ .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 1990, 61 (02) :121-141
[8]  
AXELRAD M, 1979, PROFILE ELECTRONICS
[9]  
Bartlett Donald L., 1992, AM WHAT WENT WRONG
[10]   CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBJECT MATTER IN DIFFERENT ACADEMIC AREAS [J].
BIGLAN, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 57 (03) :195-203