USE OF ECHINOCOCCUS-GRANULOSUS WORM ANTIGENS FOR IMMUNODIAGNOSIS OF E-GRANULOSUS INFECTION IN DOGS

被引:24
作者
GASSER, RB
JENKINS, DJ
HEATH, DD
LAWRENCE, SB
机构
[1] SE NEW S WALES & AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY HYDA, QUEANBEYAN, NSW 2620, AUSTRALIA
[2] MINIST AGR & FISHERIES, WALLACEVILLE ANIM RES CTR, UPPER HUTT, NEW ZEALAND
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0304-4017(92)90030-D
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
Echinococcus granulosus worm excretory/secretory antigens (WES) were used in ELISA for diagnosis of E. granulosus infection in dogs and compared with protoscolex somatic antigens (PSM). Sera from 224 dogs were tested. There was no correlation between ELISA absorbance values and E. granulosus worm burdens using either antigen. There was a significant linear relationship between absorbance values of sera tested in the ELISA using WES (W-ELISA) and the ELISA using PSM (P-ELISA). However, there was a small but significant difference between the absorbance values of the sera tested against the two antigens. Western blot analysis of WES using sera from E. granulosus-infected and uninfected dogs revealed antigenic components of relative molecular mass (Mr) larger than 94 000, Mr 94 000-68 000 and Mr 43 000-39 000 in worms, and these were specific for E. granulosus and not identified in PSM; these antigenic differences may be responsible for differences in reactivity in ELISA. The sensitivities of W-ELISA and P-ELISA were 80.8% and 75.6%, respectively. The specificities of W-ELISA and P-ELISA were 93.7% and 97.9%, respectively. The reduced specificity in W-ELISA was mainly attributable to increased background reactivity of sera from Taenia hydatigena-infected dogs. Despite the reduction in specificity, both ELISAs are valuable epidemiological tools to determine the prevalence of antibody to E. granulosus in dog populations and to monitor the success of hydatid control campaigns.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 100
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   COPROANTIGEN DETECTION FOR IMMUNODIAGNOSIS OF ECHINOCOCCOSIS AND TAENIASIS IN DOGS AND HUMANS [J].
ALLAN, JC ;
CRAIG, PS ;
NOVAL, JG ;
MENCOS, F ;
LIU, D ;
WANG, Y ;
WEN, H ;
ZHOU, P ;
STRINGER, R ;
ROGAN, M ;
ZEYHLE, E .
PARASITOLOGY, 1992, 104 :347-355
[2]  
BALDOCK FC, 1987, AUST VET PRACT, V17, P126
[3]   ECHINOCOCCUS-GRANULOSUS IN FARM DOGS AND DINGOES IN SOUTH EASTERN QUEENSLAND [J].
BALDOCK, FC ;
THOMPSON, RCA ;
KUMARATILAKE, LM ;
SHIELD, J .
AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1985, 62 (10) :335-337
[4]  
BURNETTE WN, 1981, ANAL BIOCHEM, V112, P195, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90281-5
[5]   IMMUNODETECTION OF ECHINOCOCCUS EGGS FROM NATURALLY INFECTED-DOGS AND FROM ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION SITES IN SETTLEMENTS IN TURKANA, KENYA [J].
CRAIG, PS ;
MACPHERSON, CNL ;
WATSONJONES, DL ;
NELSON, GS .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1988, 82 (02) :268-274
[6]   DETECTION OF ECHINOCOCCUS COPROANTIGENS BY ENZYME-LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY IN DOGS, DINGOES AND FOXES [J].
DEPLAZES, P ;
GOTTSTEIN, B ;
ECKERT, J ;
JENKINS, DJ ;
EWALD, D ;
JIMENEZPALACIOS, S .
PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH, 1992, 78 (04) :303-308
[7]  
Eckert J, 1984, GUIDELINES SURVEILLA
[8]   EVALUATION OF A SEROLOGICAL TEST SYSTEM FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF NATURAL ECHINOCOCCUS-GRANULOSUS INFECTION IN DOGS USING ECHINOCOCCUS-GRANULOSUS PROTOSCOLEX AND ONCOSPHERE ANTIGENS [J].
GASSER, RB ;
LIGHTOWLERS, MW ;
OBENDORF, DL ;
JENKINS, DJ ;
RICKARD, MD .
AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1988, 65 (12) :369-373
[9]   A RECOMBINANT ANTIGEN WITH POTENTIAL FOR SERODIAGNOSIS OF ECHINOCOCCUS-GRANULOSUS INFECTION IN DOGS [J].
GASSER, RB ;
LIGHTOWLERS, MW ;
RICKARD, MD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY, 1990, 20 (07) :943-950
[10]   IDENTIFICATION OF PROTEIN-COMPONENTS OF ECHINOCOCCUS-GRANULOSUS PROTOSCOLEX ANTIGENS FOR SPECIFIC SERODIAGNOSIS OF ECHINOCOCCUS-GRANULOSUS INFECTION IN DOGS [J].
GASSER, RB ;
LIGHTOWLERS, MW ;
RICKARD, MD .
PARASITE IMMUNOLOGY, 1989, 11 (03) :279-291