GROWTH AND YIELD RESPONSE OF BARLEY AND CHICKPEA TO WATER-STRESS UNDER 3 ENVIRONMENTS IN SOUTHEAST QUEENSLAND .3. WATER-USE EFFICIENCY, TRANSPIRATION EFFICIENCY AND SOIL EVAPORATION

被引:6
作者
THOMAS [1 ]
FUKAI, S [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV QUEENSLAND, DEPT AGR, BRISBANE, QLD 4072, AUSTRALIA
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH | 1995年 / 46卷 / 01期
关键词
BARLEY; CHICKPEA; WATER USE EFFICIENCY; TRANSPIRATION EFFICIENCY; SOIL EVAPORATION;
D O I
10.1071/AR9950049
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Two cultivars of barley and one cultivar of chickpea were grown in both well-watered and water stress conditions in three experiments. Water use efficiency (biomass produced per unit evapotranspiration) was lower in chickpea than in barley, and between two barley cultivars it was higher in early-maturing Corvette than in late-maturing Triumph. These differences in water use efficiency were mostly related to the differences in transpiration efficiency (biomass produced per unit transpiration). The latter appeared to reflect the differences in biomass production under well-watered conditions, as similar differences were found in light use efficiency (biomass produced per unit of photosynthetically active radiation intercepted) among the three crops. Transpiration efficiency was inversely related to vapour pressure deficit of the air. In three experiments soil evaporation accounted for about 55% and 10-30% of total water use for chickpea and barley respectively during observation periods, when rainfall was excluded from the plots. Slow canopy development of chickpea was a reason for such a high proportion of soil evaporation, and this contributed to its lower water use efficiency compared to barley. The amount of radiation transmitted to the soil surface appeared to be an important factor determining soil evaporation, even when soil water was not fully available and limiting soil evaporation.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 60
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   INFLUENCE OF ROW SPACING AND STRAW MULCH ON 1ST STAGE DRYING [J].
ADAMS, JE ;
ARKIN, GF ;
RITCHIE, JT .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1976, 40 (03) :436-442
[2]   MEASUREMENT AND ESTIMATION OF EVAPORATION FROM SOIL UNDER SPARSE BARLEY CROPS IN NORTHERN SYRIA [J].
ALLEN, SJ .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1990, 49 (04) :291-309
[3]   A MODEL OF WATER LIMITATION ON SPRING WHEAT GROWTH AND YIELD [J].
AMIR, J ;
SINCLAIR, TR .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1991, 28 (1-2) :59-69
[4]   METHOD FOR MEASURING FIRST-STAGE SOIL-WATER EVAPORATION IN FIELD [J].
ARKIN, GF ;
RITCHIE, JT ;
ADAMS, JE .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1974, 38 (06) :951-954
[5]   A MICRO-LYSIMETER METHOD FOR DETERMINING EVAPORATION FROM BARE SOIL - DESCRIPTION AND LABORATORY EVALUATION [J].
BOAST, CW ;
ROBERTSON, TM .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1982, 46 (04) :689-696
[6]  
DUGAS WA, 1985, ADV EVAPOTRANSPIRATI, P108
[7]  
FUKAI T, 1995, GR RES A, V46, P35
[8]  
FUKAI T, 1905, AUST J AGR RES, V46, P17
[9]   ADVECTION AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION OF WIDE-ROW SORGHUM IN CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS [J].
HANKS, RJ ;
ALLEN, LH ;
GARDNER, HR .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1971, 63 (04) :520-&
[10]   CARBON ISOTOPE DISCRIMINATION AND THE RATIO OF CARBON GAINED TO WATER LOST IN BARLEY CULTIVARS [J].
HUBICK, K ;
FARQUHAR, G .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1989, 12 (08) :795-804