DOES MOTION-INDUCED GROUPING MODULATE THE FLANKER COMPATIBILITY EFFECT - A FAILURE TO REPLICATE DRIVER AND BAYLIS

被引:17
作者
BERRY, G [1 ]
KLEIN, R [1 ]
机构
[1] DALHOUSIE UNIV,DEPT PSYCHOL,HALIFAX B3H 4J1,NS,CANADA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE | 1993年 / 47卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1037/h0078867
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Several experiments explored the possibility that motion-induced grouping would modulate the spatial distribution of the flanker compatibility effect (FCE). Subjects were required to make a speeded decision about a central target letter embedded in a five letter string. On each trial the identity of the near or far letters was either compatible or incompatible with the correct response while the remaining letters were neutral. In contrast to the findings of Driver & Baylis (1989), when the far distracters and the target moved together while the near distracters remained stationary, we did NOT find that the FCE for the far distracters was greater than the FCE for the stationary near distracters. Moreover, the pattern of response latencies in this moving condition were not different from what we observed when all letters remained stationary. Accuracy was affected, but not in the direction predicted by the view that attention is directed to perceptual groups. Modulation of the distribution of attention in response to motion-induced grouping is not a robust phenomenon. Nevertheless, a simple spotlight model of attention is challenged by demonstrations in the literature that perceptual grouping mediated by static properties such as closure, colour and good continuation strongly influence the spatial distribution of the FCE and that the allocation of attention in search is strongly influenced by stimulus motion.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 729
页数:16
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1890, PRINCIPLES PSYCHOL
[2]   TENDENCIES TO EYE-MOVEMENT AND PERCEPTUAL ACCURACY [J].
CROVITZ, HF ;
DAVES, W .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1962, 63 (05) :495-&
[3]  
Downing C., 1985, ATTENTION PERFORM
[4]   REVERSING VISUAL-SEARCH ASYMMETRIES WITH CONJUNCTIONS OF MOVEMENT AND ORIENTATION [J].
DRIVER, J ;
MCLEOD, P .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1992, 18 (01) :22-33
[5]   MOVEMENT AND VISUAL-ATTENTION - THE SPOTLIGHT METAPHOR BREAKS DOWN [J].
DRIVER, J ;
BAYLIS, GC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1989, 15 (03) :448-456
[6]   TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SELECTIVE ENCODING FROM VISUAL DISPLAYS [J].
ERIKSEN, CW ;
HOFFMAN, JE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1972, 12 (2B) :201-&
[7]   VISUAL-ATTENTION WITHIN AND AROUND THE FIELD OF FOCAL ATTENTION - A ZOOM LENS MODEL [J].
ERIKSEN, CW ;
STJAMES, JD .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1986, 40 (04) :225-240
[8]  
James W., 1890, PRINCIPLES PSYCHOL, V1
[9]   MOVEMENT AND FOCUSED ATTENTION - A FAILURE TO REPLICATE [J].
KRAMER, AF ;
THAM, MP ;
YEH, YY .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1991, 50 (06) :537-546
[10]   PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION AND FOCUSED ATTENTION - THE ROLE OF OBJECTS AND PROXIMITY IN VISUAL PROCESSING [J].
KRAMER, AF ;
JACOBSON, A .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1991, 50 (03) :267-284