THE LACTATIONAL AMENORRHEA METHOD (LAM) - A POSTPARTUM INTRODUCTORY FAMILY-PLANNING METHOD WITH POLICY AND PROGRAM IMPLICATIONS

被引:36
作者
LABBOK, MH
PEREZ, A
VALDES, V
SEVILLA, F
WADE, K
LAUKARAN, VH
COONEY, KA
COLY, S
SANDERS, C
QUEENAN, JT
机构
[1] Institute for Reproductive Health, Breastfeeding and MCH Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., 20007, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue
[2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago
[3] Department of Pediatrics, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago
[4] Centro Medico de Orientacion y Planificacion Familiar (CEMOPLAF), Quito
[5] Institute for Applied Social and Policy Research, The Claremont Graduate School, Claremont
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF01978103
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
It is well accepted that breastfeeding contributes significantly to child survival and child nutrition. Healthful child spacing is associated with improved birth outcomes and maternal recovery. On a population basis, breastfeeding may contribute more to birth spacing than all family planning use combined in many countries. However, while breastfeeding does provide a period of infertility, until recently, there was no reliable way for an individual woman to capitalize on this lactational infertility for her own efficacious child spacing. The Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM) is a new introductory family planning method that simultaneously promotes child spacing and breastfeeding, with its optimal nutrition and disease preventive benefits for the infant. LAM, as it is called, is based on the utilization of lactational infertility for protection from pregnancy and indicates the time for the introduction of a complementary family planning method. LAM is recommended for up to six months postpartum for women who are fully or nearly fully breastfeeding and amenorrheic, and relies on the maintenance of appropriate breastfeeding practices to prolong lactational infertility, with the concomitant delay in menses return. A recent clinical trial confirmed the theoretical 98% or higher effectiveness of the method and field trials are demonstrating its acceptability. Nonetheless, some demographers and family planning organizations continue to debate its value. The development, efficacy, and sequelae of the method are presented using data from several studies by the authors.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 109
页数:17
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Labbok M., Breastfeeding and contraception, N Engl J Med, 308, (1983)
[2]  
Labbok M., Contraception during lactation: considerations in advising the individual and in formulating proramme guidelines, J Bio Sci., 9, pp. 55-66, (1985)
[3]  
Labbok M., Chassel R., The development and use of graphically presented algorithms in community-based family planning services, Int Q Comm Hlth Educ., 8, 3, pp. 223-47, (1987)
[4]  
Diaz S., Rodriguez G., Peralta O., Miranda P., Casado M., Salvatierra A., Herros C., Brandeis A., Croxatto H., Lactational amenorrnea and the recovery of ovulation and fertility in fully nursing Chilean women, Contraception, 38, pp. 53-67, (1988)
[5]  
Breastfeeding as a family planning method, Lancet, 2, pp. 1204-5, (1988)
[6]  
Kennedy K., Riveras R., McNeilly A., Consensus statement on the use of breastfeeding as a family planning method, Contraception, 39, pp. 477-96, (1989)
[7]  
Gray R., Campbell O., Apelo R., Eslami S., Zacur H., Ramos R., Gehret J., Labbok M., The risk of ovulation during lactation, Lancet, 335, pp. 25-9, (1990)
[8]  
Kennedy K., Visness C., Contraceptive efficacy of lactational amenorrhea, Lancet., 339, pp. 227-9, (1992)
[9]  
Labbok M., Krasovec K., Towards consistency in breastfeeding definitions, Stud Fam Plann, 21, 4, pp. 226-30, (1990)
[10]  
Perez A., Vela P., Potter R., Masnick G., Timing and sequence of resuming ovulation and menstruation after childbirth, Population Studies, 25, 3, pp. 491-503, (1971)