DIGITIZATION REQUIREMENTS IN MAMMOGRAPHY - EFFECTS ON COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION OF MICROCALCIFICATIONS

被引:60
作者
CHAN, HP
NIKLASON, LT
IKEDA, DM
LAM, KL
ADLER, DD
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; MICROCALCIFICATIONS; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; GRAY-LEVEL RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1118/1.597354
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We have developed a computerized method for detection of microcalcifications on digitized mammograms. The program has achieved an accuracy that can detect subtle microcalcifications which may potentially be missed by radiologists. In this study, we evaluated the dependence of the detection accuracy on the pixel size and pixel depth of the digitized mammograms. The mammograms were digitized with a laser film scanner at a pixel size of 0.035 mm x0.035 mm and 12-bit gray levels. Digitization with larger pixel sizes or fewer number of bits was simulated by averaging adjacent pixels or by eliminating the least significant bits, respectively. The SNR enhancement filter and the signal-extraction criteria in the computer program were adjusted to maximize the accuracy of signal detection for each pixel size. The overall detection accuracy was compared using the free response receiver operating characteristic curves. The results indicate that the detection accuracy decreases significantly as the pixel size increases from 0.035 mm x 0.035 mm to 0.07 mm x 0.07 mm (P<0.007) and from 0.07 mm x 0.07 mm to 0.105 mm x 0.105 mm (P<0.002). The detection accuracy is essentially independent of pixel depth from 12 to 9 bits and decreases significantly (P<0.003) from 9 to 8 bits; a rapid decrease is observed as the pixel depth decreases further from 8 to 7 bits (P<0.03) or from 7 to 6 bits (P<0.02). Although the results are expected to depend on the noise and spatial resolution properties of the x-ray screen-film system and the film digitizer, as well as on the image processing methods, this study demonstrates that very high spatial resolution (a pixel size of 0.035 mm x 0.035 mm or smaller) will be required for digital mammographic systems in order to capture the very subtle microcalcifications detectable on screen-film mammograms.
引用
收藏
页码:1203 / 1211
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] ASTLEY S, 1993, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1905, P716, DOI 10.1117/12.148683
  • [2] SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF 1ST SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE CANADIAN NATIONAL BREAST SCREENING STUDY - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT FROM 5 CENTERS
    BAINES, CJ
    MILLER, AB
    WALL, C
    MCFARLANE, DV
    SIMOR, IS
    JONG, R
    SHAPIRO, BJ
    AUDET, L
    PETITCLERC, M
    OUIMETOLIVA, D
    LADOUCEUR, J
    HEBERT, G
    MINUK, T
    HARDY, G
    STANDING, HK
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1986, 160 (02) : 295 - 298
  • [3] BANKMAN IN, 1993, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1905, P731, DOI 10.1117/12.148684
  • [4] BREAST-CANCER DETECTION - ONE VERSUS 2 VIEWS
    BASSETT, LW
    BUNNELL, DH
    JAHANSHAHI, R
    GOLD, RH
    ARNDT, RD
    LINSMAN, J
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1987, 165 (01) : 95 - 97
  • [5] BRZAKOVIC D, 1993, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1905, P690, DOI 10.1117/12.148680
  • [6] BUNCH PC, 1977, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V127, P124
  • [7] MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS OF FREE-RESPONSE RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (FROC) DATA
    CHAKRABORTY, DP
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) : 561 - 568
  • [8] FREE-RESPONSE METHODOLOGY - ALTERNATE ANALYSIS AND A NEW OBSERVER-PERFORMANCE EXPERIMENT
    CHAKRABORTY, DP
    WINTER, LHL
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (03) : 873 - 881
  • [9] IMAGE FEATURE ANALYSIS AND COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY .1. AUTOMATED DETECTION OF MICROCALCIFICATIONS IN MAMMOGRAPHY
    CHAN, HP
    DOI, K
    GALHOTRA, S
    VYBORNY, CJ
    MACMAHON, H
    JOKICH, PM
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1987, 14 (04) : 538 - 548
  • [10] DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY - ROC STUDIES OF THE EFFECTS OF PIXEL SIZE AND UNSHARP-MASK FILTERING ON THE DETECTION OF SUBTLE MICROCALCIFICATIONS
    CHAN, HP
    VYBORNY, CJ
    MACMAHON, H
    METZ, CE
    DOI, K
    SICKLES, EA
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1987, 22 (07) : 581 - 589