AVERSIVELY MOTIVATED CHANGES IN MEAL PATTERNS OF RATS IN A CLOSED ECONOMY - THE EFFECTS OF SHOCK DENSITY

被引:30
作者
HELMSTETTER, FJ [1 ]
FANSELOW, MS [1 ]
机构
[1] DARTMOUTH COLL,HANOVER,NH 03755
来源
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR | 1993年 / 21卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03213397
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Rats lived continuously in an operant chamber in which they were able to press a bar to obtain food on a chained FR50:CRF schedule that allowed them control of both the size and frequency of individual meals. Independent groups of animals were scheduled to receive 12, 24, 48, or 96 electric shocks per day, which were given randomly in time and independent of the subjects' behavior. Rats could avoid shock by remaining in a safe area of the chamber, but they were always at risk while barpressing. The introduction of shock resulted in a number of changes in feeding patterns. In rats exposed to a possible 12 shocks/day, meal size increased whereas meal frequency changed very little. At 24 shocks/day, meal frequency decreased whereas meal size increased such that net intake remained stable relative to a preshock baseline period. As shock density was increased to 48 or 96 shocks/day, total intake was suppressed. At 96 shocks/day, both meal frequency and meal size decreased dramatically. Shock-related changes were also observed in rates of operant responding and in the amount of time the animals engaged in feeding-related behavior. All of the animals were able to achieve a greater than 50 % reduction in the total number of shocks received relative to equivalent random samples of their position in the apparatus taken during baseline. These results support the position that the nature of defensive changes in feeding behavior that are seen when an aversive stimulus is introduced into a simulated foraging situation varies as a function of risk.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 175
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
BOLLES R C, 1973, Learning and Motivation, V4, P268, DOI 10.1016/0023-9690(73)90016-7
[2]   ECOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS OF REINFORCEMENT IN RAT [J].
COLLIER, G ;
HIRSCH, E ;
HAMLIN, PH .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1972, 9 (05) :705-716
[3]  
COOLIER GH, 1983, ADV ANAL BEHAVIOR BI, P223
[4]  
Fanselow M.S., 1988, P185
[5]   CHANGES IN FEEDING AND FORAGING PATTERNS AS AN ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSIVE STRATEGY - A LABORATORY SIMULATION USING AVERSIVE-STIMULATION IN A CLOSED ECONOMY [J].
FANSELOW, MS ;
LESTER, LS ;
HELMSTETTER, FJ .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1988, 50 (03) :361-374
[6]  
HURSH SJ, 1980, J EXPT ANAL BEHAVIOR, V34, P435
[7]   HOMEOSTATIC COMPETITION BETWEEN FOOD-INTAKE AND TEMPERATURE REGULATION IN RATS [J].
JOHNSON, KG ;
CABANAC, M .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1982, 28 (04) :675-679
[8]  
KREBS J, 1981, BEHAVIOURAL ECOLOGY
[9]  
KREBS JR, 1980, ARDEA, V68, P83
[10]   NOCTURNALITY AS A DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOR IN THE RAT - AN ANALYSIS IN TERMS OF SELECTIVE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN LIGHT AND AVERSIVE-STIMULATION [J].
LESTER, LS ;
FANSELOW, MS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 1992, 42 (02) :221-253