A MULTICENTER RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE CLINICAL-RESULTS OF THE LIN(R) SB CHARITE INTERVERTEBRAL PROSTHESIS - THE INITIAL EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE

被引:147
作者
GRIFFITH, SL
SHELOKOV, AP
BUTTNERJANZ, K
LEMAIRE, JP
ZEEGERS, WS
机构
[1] Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, TX
[2] Texas Back Institute, Plano, TX
[3] Krkh Berlin-Kaulsdorf, Berlin
[4] Centre D’Etude et de Chirurgie du Rachis, Dijon
[5] Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, TX
关键词
INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS; ARTIFICIAL DISC REPLACEMENT; LUMBAR SPINE;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199408150-00009
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. This study is a multicenter, retrospective review of the initial clinical results of an artificial disc replacement, the LINK(R) SB Charite intervertebral prosthesis. Methods. Independent analysis by chart review included patient demographics, surgical data, and a comparison of presurgical to follow-up data. Data were analyzed from 93 patients (average age = 43.0 +/- 7.3) in whom a total of 139 Model III prostheses (Waldemar Link GmbH & Co, Hamburg, Germany) were implanted. Results. The predominant diagnostic indication for the disc was degenerative disc disease (52.4%). The L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels comprised 87.1% of all levels implanted. The average follow-up was 11.5 +/- 8.4 months. After disc, implantation, a significant proportion of the patient sample experienced pain relief (P < 0.05). Improvements were also noted in pain intensity, walking distance, lumbar mobility, and the percentage of patients showing a positive SLR or neurological weakness. No difference in work status after disc implantation could be detected. Device failure, migration, or dislocation occurred in 6 of 93 (6.5%) patients. Conclusions. This study represents the largest multicenter case series of any functional artificial disc implantation. Carefully controlled, prospective studies that compare disc implantation and fusion are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1842 / 1849
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Alexander H., Chen E., Alastair C., Langrana N., Lee C., Parsons J., Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer, US Patent, (1990)
  • [2] Bao Q.B., Higham P., Hydrogel intervertebral disc nucleus, US Patent, (1991)
  • [3] Biittner-Janz K., Schellnack K., Zippel H., Conrad P., Ex perience and results with the SB Charite lumbar intervertebral endoprosthesis, Z Klin Med, 43, 20, (1988)
  • [4] Biittner-Janz K., Derr B., Erkel K.P., Helisch H.J., Schellnack K., Schumann R., I, Ntervertebral Disc Endoprosthesis, (1988)
  • [5] Biittner-Janz K., Schellnack K., Zippel H., Biomechanics of the SB Charite lumbar intervertebral disc endoprosthesis, Int Orthop, 13, (1989)
  • [6] Biittner-Janz K., The Development of the Artificial Disc, pp. 1-181, (1992)
  • [7] David T., Lumbar disc prosthesis, Eur Spine J, 1, pp. 254-259, (1993)
  • [8] Downey E., Replacement Disc, (1991)
  • [9] Enker P., Steffe A., McMillin C., Keppler L., Biscup R., Miller S., Artificial disc replacement: Preliminary report with a 3-year minimum follow-up, Spine, 18, 8, pp. 1061-1070, (1993)
  • [10] Fernie G., Hedman T., Kostuik J., Maki B., Artificial Spinal Disc, (1988)