COMPARABILITY AND PRECISION OF MAP3S AND NADP/NTN PRECIPITATION CHEMISTRY DATA AT AN ACIDIC SITE IN EASTERN NORTH-AMERICA

被引:23
作者
LAMB, D
COMRIE, L
机构
[1] Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park
来源
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS | 1993年 / 27卷 / 13期
关键词
PRECIPITATION CHEMISTRY; ACIDIC DEPOSITION; DATA INTERCOMPARISON; MAP3S; NADP/NTN;
D O I
10.1016/0960-1686(93)90273-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Precipitation chemistry data derived from more than six years of concurrent sampling under the MAP3S and NADP/NTN protocols at the Penn State site in rural Pennsylvania are compared. Preprocessing of the data (sample and gage depths, concentrations of H3O+, SO42-, NO3-, NH4+) included aggregating the event and daily MAP3S data into weekly averages that coincide with the weekly data of the NADP/NTN program. A simple statistical model was applied to the differences of the paired data to look for systematic biases between the networks. The most notable bias occurred for ammonium concentration (NADP/NTN low), a finding consistent with other studies. A minor, but statistically significant, bias was also found for sulfate concentration (NADP/NTN high). Both the ammonium and sulfate biases may be related to the relatively long time that the NADP/NTN samples remain in the field, thus strengthening arguments in favor of daily sampling protocols. The hydronium and nitrate concentrations exhibited remarkably high levels of comparability between the daily and weekly protocols. Overall, the data from the MAP3S and NADP/NTN networks are comparable, with the possible exception of ammonium, for some applications. The field results from about two years of duplicate sampling under the MAP3S protocol demonstrate that measurement precisions of only a few percent are possible when the protocol is consistently followed and the equipment is well maintained.
引用
收藏
页码:1993 / 2008
页数:16
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   SPATIAL AND HISTORICAL TRENDS IN ACIDIC DEPOSITION - A GRAPHICAL INTERSITE COMPARISON [J].
ALTWICKER, ER ;
JOHANNES, AH .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1987, 21 (01) :129-135
[2]  
BARRIE LA, 1984, TELLUS B, V36, P333, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0889.1984.tb00253.x
[3]  
BIGELOW DS, 1988, INSTRUCTION MANUAL N
[4]  
BOWERSOX VC, 1980, THESIS PENN STATE U
[5]   THE IMPACT OF CHANGING REGIONAL EMISSIONS ON PRECIPITATION CHEMISTRY IN THE EASTERN UNITED-STATES [J].
BUTLER, TJ ;
LIKENS, GE .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1991, 25 (02) :305-315
[6]   STATISTICAL SUMMARY AND ANALYSES OF EVENT PRECIPITATION CHEMISTRY FROM THE MAP3S NETWORK, 1976-1983 [J].
DANA, MT ;
EASTER, RC .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1987, 21 (01) :113-128
[7]  
DANA MT, 1989, PNL6885UC402 PAC NW
[8]   WET DEPOSITION MONITORING EFFECT OF SAMPLING PERIOD [J].
DEPENA, RG ;
WALKER, KC ;
LEBOWITZ, L ;
MICKA, JG .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1985, 19 (01) :151-156
[9]  
DEPENA RG, 1980, 1416309 U CAL PENN S
[10]  
HALES JM, 1987, B AM METEOROL SOC, V68, P216, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1987)068<0216:TRORMN>2.0.CO