RELIABILITY OF HEMODIALYSIS UREA KINETIC MODELING IN CHILDREN

被引:10
作者
BUUR, T
BRADBURY, MG
SMYE, SW
BROCKLEBANK, JT
机构
[1] Department of Renal Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds
[2] Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, St James's University Hospital, Leeds
[3] Department of Medical Physics, St James's University Hospital, Leeds
关键词
ADEQUACY OF DIALYSIS; COMPUTER; DIALYSATE COLLECTION; HEMODIALYSIS; UREA KINETIC MODELING;
D O I
10.1007/BF00858131
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The reliability of urea kinetic modelling (UKM) in paediatric haemodialysis was tested by comparing results of the classic variable volume model (UKM(3)), a recently introduced two-sample modification of this (UKM(2)) and direct quantification by a partial dialysate collection method (PDC). Urea generation rate (G) was also found from a 1-week collection of dialysate and urine (OWC). Nine children aged 2-18 years and weighing 10.6-39.9 kg were examined over 1 week (25 treatments). UKM(3) and UKM(2) gave almost identical results, but deviated from PDC and OWC. The two indirect methods overestimated G by 24% and 18%. However, the correlations between the results were very high for all variables and all methods (r greater than or equal to 0.96). Repeating UKM(3) and UKM(2) mid-week for 5 consecutive weeks, the following coefficients of variation were found: for the normalised whole body urea clearance (Kt/V) 10% and 11%, respectively; for normalised protein catabolic rate 17% and 14%. It is concluded that all tested methods can be used, but each method requires its own reference interval. Results of UKM seem to vary somewhat more than in adults. This should be considered when assessing children by such methods.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 578
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Hakim R.M., Depner T.A., Parker T.F., Adequacy of hemodialysis, Am J Kidney Dis, 20, pp. 107-123, (1992)
[2]  
Vanholder R.C., Ringoir S.M., Adequacy of dialysis: a critical analysis, Kidney Int, 42, pp. 540-558, (1992)
[3]  
Farrell P.C., Adequacy of dialysis: marker molecules and kinetic modeling, Artif Organs, 10, pp. 195-200, (1986)
[4]  
Laird N.M., Berkey C.S., Lowrie E.G., Modeling success or failure of dialysis therapy: the National Cooperative Dialysis Study, Kidney Int, 23, pp. S101-S106, (1983)
[5]  
Gotch F.A., Sargent J.A., A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS), Kidney Int, 28, pp. 526-534, (1985)
[6]  
Buur T., Timpka T., Lundberg M., Urea kinetics and clinical evaluation of the haemodialysis patient, Nephrol Dial Transplant, 5, pp. 347-351, (1990)
[7]  
Barth R.H., Direct calculation of KT/V, Nephron, 50, pp. 191-195, (1988)
[8]  
Buur T., Larsson R., Accuracy of hemodialysis urea kinetic modeling. Comparison of different models, Nephron, 59, pp. 358-363, (1991)
[9]  
Buur T., Precision of hemodialysis urea kinetic modeling: empirical data and Monte Carlo simulation, Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 35, pp. 25-34, (1991)
[10]  
Tiffany T.O., Jansen J.M., Burtis C.A., Overton J.B., Scott C.D., Enzymatic kinetic rate and end-point analyses of substrate by use of a GeMSAEC fast analyzer, Clin Chem, 18, pp. 829-840, (1972)