PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION AT THE ANKLE JOINT

被引:29
作者
BRUNS, J
ROSENBACH, B
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Hamburg, Hamburg
关键词
Ankle joint; cadaveric biostatic model; osteochondral lesion; pressure distribution;
D O I
10.1016/0268-0033(90)90018-2
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Biomechanical factors such as trauma or overweight are discussed in relation to the aetiology of osteochondral lesions. As a consequence of the possible influence of these factors on joint loading patterns the pressure distribution on the load-bearing ankle joint has been investigated in a cadaveric biostatic model. By creating different joint positions with and without either lateral or medial ligament dissection, mimicking a ligamentous supination or pronation trauma, the pressure distribution under these various loading conditions was determined using pressure-sensitive film. The location of transduced contact area, the size and the amount of pressure was evaluated during the study. The results show that the location of the contact area was dependent on the joint position. Even without ligament dissection there was a minimum of contact area in the varus and the supination position with a pressure maximum lying on the medial border of the talus. Ligament dissection of the lateral ligaments resulted in an increased contact area in all the joint positions except for the varus and the supination position. In addition, the pressure increased significantly in the dorsal extension, varus and supination positions following lateral ligament dissection. Medial ligament dissection yielded results opposite to those observed with the lateral ligament dissection. The pressure maximum was observed to be, in the valgus and pronation position, on the lateral talar border with a significant increase of the pressure maxima following ligament dissection. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 161
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Aichroth, Osteochondrosis dissecans of the knee, J Bone Joint Surg, 53 B, pp. 440-447, (1971)
[2]  
Aichroth, Osteochondral fractures and their relationship to osteochondritis dissecans of the knee, J Bone Joint Surg, 53 B, pp. 448-454, (1971)
[3]  
Alexander, Lichtman, Surgical treatment of transchondral talar dome fractures (osteochondritis dissecans), J Bone Joint Surg, 62 A, pp. 646-652, (1980)
[4]  
Bandi, Zur Pathogenese der osteochondritis dissecans, Unfallheilkunde, 81, pp. 295-298, (1988)
[5]  
Berndt, Harty, Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus, J Bone Joint Surg, 41 A, pp. 988-1020, (1951)
[6]  
Blohm, Strijk, Lesions of the trochlea tali, Radiologia Clin, 44, pp. 387-396, (1975)
[7]  
Bruns, Rosenbach, Osteochondrosis dissecans tali: a follow-up-examination, Z Orthop, 127, pp. 549-555, (1989)
[8]  
Campbell, Ranawat, Osteochondritis dissecans: the question of etiology, J Trauma, 6, pp. 201-221, (1966)
[9]  
Huylebroek, Martens, Simon, Transchondral talar dome fracture, Arch Orthop Traum Surg, 104, pp. 238-241, (1985)
[10]  
Mannis, Transchondral fracture of the dome of the talus sustained during weight training, Am J Sports Med, 11, pp. 354-356, (1983)