Leader-follower equilibria for electric power and NOx allowances markets

被引:59
作者
Chen, Yihsu [1 ]
Hobbs, Benjamin F. [1 ]
Leyffer, Sven [2 ]
Munson, Todd S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Argonne Natl Lab, Math & Comp Sci Div, 9700 South Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
关键词
Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints (MPEC); Game theory (Stackelberg game); Economic market modelling; Optimization algorithm; Electric power;
D O I
10.1007/s10287-006-0020-1
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the ability of the largest producer in an electricity market to manipulate both the electricity and emission allowances markets to its advantage. A Stackelberg game to analyze this situation is constructed in which the largest firm plays the role of the leader, while the medium-sized firms are treated as Cournot followers with price-taking fringes that behave competitively in both markets. Since there is no explicit representation of the best-reply function for each follower, this Stackelberg game is formulated as a large-scale mathematical program with equilibrium constraints. The best-reply functions are implicitly represented by a set of nonlinear complementarity conditions. Analysis of the computed solution for the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland electricity market shows that the leader can gain substantial profits by withholding allowances and driving up NOx allowance costs for rival producers. The allowances price is higher than the corresponding price in the Nash-Cournot case, although the electricity prices are essentially the same.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 330
页数:24
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
ANITESCU M, 2000, ANLMCSP8641200 MATH
[2]  
Bushnell J, 2005, WP126 UCEI U CAL BER
[3]   An oligopolistic power market model with tradable NOx permits [J].
Chen, YS ;
Hobbs, BF .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (01) :119-129
[4]   A stochastic version of a Stackelberg-Nash-Cournot equilibrium model [J].
DeWolf, D ;
Smeers, Y .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1997, 43 (02) :190-197
[5]  
Dirkse S. P., 1995, OPTIMIZATION METHODS, V5, P123, DOI DOI 10.1080/10556789508805606
[6]  
Entriken R., 2003, PUSHING CAPACITY PAY
[7]  
Entriken R., 2005, P 38 ANN HAW INT C S, P92
[8]   The NOx Budget: market-based control of tropospheric ozone in the northeastern United States [J].
Farrell, A ;
Carter, R ;
Raufer, R .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1999, 21 (02) :103-124
[9]   Complementarity problems in GAMS and the PATH solver [J].
Ferris, MC ;
Munson, TS .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2000, 24 (02) :165-188
[10]   Solving mathematical programs with complementarity constraints as nonlinear programs [J].
Fletcher, R ;
Leyffer, S .
OPTIMIZATION METHODS & SOFTWARE, 2004, 19 (01) :15-40