Efficacy of the Local Injection of Methylprednisolone Acetate in the Subacromial Impingement Syndrome. A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

被引:9
作者
Alvarez-Nemegyei, Jose [1 ]
Bassol-Perea, Alejandro [2 ]
Rosado Pasos, Jose [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Mexicano Seguro Social, Unidad Med Alta Especialidad 25, Unidad Invest Med, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico
[2] Inst Mexicano Seguro Social, Unidad Med Alta Especialidad 25, Serv Ortoped, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico
[3] Inst Mexicano Seguro Social, Unidad Med Alta Especialidad 25, Unidad Med Fis & Rehabil, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico
来源
REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA | 2008年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
Shoulder pain; Rotator cuff; Therapy; Clinical trial; Glucocorticosteroid injection;
D O I
10.1016/S1699-258X(08)71799-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: Local glucocorticosteroid injections are frequently used in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS), however its efficacy is still controversial. Objective: To compare the efficacy of the subacromial injection of methylprenisoloneacetate plus lidocaine (MPL) versus lidocaine alone (LA) in SIS. Material and method: Consecutive SIS subjects, defined as a positive Neer's injection test were randomized to a subacromial injection of 2 mL methylprednisolone acetate (40 mg/ mL) plus 1 mL of 1% lidocaine (27 patients); or 3 mL of 1% lidocaine (29 patients) were studied. The change from baseline of the score of a Spanish validated version of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (S-SDQ), pain intensity, and shoulder range of motion were measured at 15 and 30 days, and afterward every month for five months. Results: After adjusting for duration of symptoms and pain intensity at baseline by way of a general lineal model, we did not find differences in the change of S-SDQ scores and shoulder range of motion between the study groups. Subjects randomized to LA had greater improvement of pain intensity than MPL subjects during the entire follow-up. Conclusions: A subacromial injection of methylprednisolone acetate was not more efficacious than the injection of lydocaine alone in patients with SIS.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 54
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Is local subacromial corticosteroid injection beneficial in subacromial impingement syndrome? [J].
Akgün, K ;
Birtane, M ;
Akarirmak, Ü .
CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2004, 23 (06) :496-500
[2]
A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing subacromial injection of betamethasone and xylocaine to xylocaine alone in chronic rotator cuff tendinosis [J].
Alvarez, CM ;
Litchfield, R ;
Jackowski, D ;
Griffin, S ;
Kirkley, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (02) :255-262
[3]
Development of a Spanish-language version of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire [J].
Alvarez-Nemegyei, J ;
Puerto-Ceballos, I ;
Guzmán-Hau, W ;
Bassol-Perea, A ;
Nuño-Gutiérrez, BL .
JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 11 (04) :185-187
[4]
Evidence-based soft tissue rheumatology. Part I - Subacromial impingement syndrome [J].
Alvarez-Nemegyei, J ;
Canoso, AJ .
JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 9 (03) :193-199
[5]
[Anonymous], 2000, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001156
[6]
The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in subacromial impingement syndrome [J].
Birtane, M ;
Çalis, M ;
Akgün, K .
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 42 (04) :418-424
[7]
Efficacy of injections of corticosteroids for subacromial impingement syndrome [J].
Blair, B ;
Rokito, AS ;
Cuomo, F ;
Jarolem, K ;
Zuckerman, JD .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (11) :1685-1689
[8]
Buchbinder R, 2003, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V2003, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD004016
[9]
Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome [J].
Çalis, M ;
Akgün, K ;
Birtane, M ;
Karacan, I ;
Çalis, H ;
Tüzün, F .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2000, 59 (01) :44-47
[10]
Ultrasound-guided shoulder injections in the treatment of subacromial bursitis [J].
Chen, MJL ;
Lew, HL ;
Hsu, TC ;
Tsai, VC ;
Lin, VC ;
Tang, SFT ;
Lee, YC ;
Hsu, RCH ;
Chen, CPC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2006, 85 (01) :31-35