FAVORABLE PROGNOSIS OF HYPERDIPLOID COMMON ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA MAY BE EXPLAINED BY SENSITIVITY TO ANTIMETABOLITES AND OTHER DRUGS - RESULTS OF AN IN-VITRO STUDY

被引:126
作者
KASPERS, GJL
SMETS, LA
PIETERS, R
VANZANTWIJK, CH
VANWERING, ER
VEERMAN, AJP
机构
[1] NETHERLANDS CANC INST, DEPT EXPTL THERAPY, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
[2] DUTCH CHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA STUDY GRP, THE HAGUE, NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
10.1182/blood.V85.3.751.bloodjournal853751
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
DNA hyperdiploidy is a favorable prognostic factor in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The explanation for this prognostic significance is largely unknown. We have studied whether DNA ploidy was related to cellular resistance to 12 drugs, assessed with the methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium assay, in samples of 74 children with common (CD10+ precursor B-cell) ALL, Sixteen patients had hyperdiploid ALL cells and 58 patients had nonhyperdiploid ALL cells. Hyperdiploid ALL cells were more sensitive to mercaptopurine (median, 9.0-fold; P = .000003), to thioguanine (1.4-fold; P = .023), to cytarabine (1.8-fold; P = .016), and to I-asparaginase (19.5-fold; P = .022) than were nonhyperdiploid ALL cells. In contrast, these two ploidy groups did not differ significantly in resistance to prednisolone, dexamethasone, vincristine, vindesine, daunorubicin, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, and teniposide. The percentage of S-phase cells was higher (P = .05) in the hyperdiploid ALL samples (median, 8.5%) than in the nonhyperdiploid ALL samples (median. 5.7%). However, the percentage of cells in S-phase was not significantly related to in vitro drug resistance. We conclude that the favorable prognosis associated with DNA hyperdiploidy in childhood common ALL may be explained by a relative sensitivity of hyperdiploid common ALL cells to antimetabolites, especially to mercaptopurine and to I-asparaginase. (C) 1995 by The American Society of Hematology.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 756
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   THE MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA - CONCORDANCE AMONG OBSERVERS AND CLINICAL CORRELATIONS [J].
BENNETT, JM ;
CATOVSKY, D ;
DANIEL, MT ;
FLANDRIN, G ;
GALTON, DAG ;
GRALNICK, HR ;
SULTAN, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1981, 47 (04) :553-+
[2]  
CAMPANA D, 1993, BLOOD, V82, pA49
[3]  
EVANS WE, 1989, PEDIATR CLIN N AM, V36, P1199
[5]  
HARRIS MB, 1992, BLOOD, V79, P3316
[6]   APOPTOSIS INDUCED BY ANTICANCER DRUGS [J].
HICKMAN, JA .
CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 1992, 11 (02) :121-139
[7]  
JACKSON JF, 1990, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V66, P1183, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:6<1183::AID-CNCR2820660618>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-P
[9]   INVITRO DRUG SENSITIVITY OF NORMAL PERIPHERAL-BLOOD LYMPHOCYTES AND CHILDHOOD LEUKEMIC-CELLS FROM BONE-MARROW AND PERIPHERAL-BLOOD [J].
KASPERS, GJL ;
PIETERS, R ;
VANZANTWIJK, CH ;
DELAAT, PAJM ;
DEWAAL, FC ;
VANWERING, ER ;
VEERMAN, AJP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 64 (03) :469-474
[10]  
KASPERS GJL, 1994, IN PRESS J CANCER