EFFECT OF E-4031, A NEW CLASS-III ANTIARRHYTHMIC DRUG, ON REENTRANT VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS - COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL CLASS-I DRUGS

We evaluated the antiarrhythmic efficacy of E-4031, a new class III drug, and compared it with that of conventional class I and II antiarrhythmic agents in terms of electrophysiological actions on refractoriness and conduction in a 7-day-old canine model of myocardial infarction. Sustained monomorphic VT was reproducibly induced in 26 dogs by a premature stimulation method from the right ventricle. Class I drugs (disopyramide, aprindine, flecainide) prevented VT induction in 5 of 13 dogs, and propranolol and E-4031 prevented it in 6 of 6 and 6 of 7 dogs, respectively. The effective refractory period (ERP) was determined at 47 epicardial sites overlying the infarct in each experiment by a S1S2 method. The standard deviation (SD) of the mean ERP of these sites was used as an index of ERP dispersion. The extent of ERP prolongation produced by class I drugs and E-4031 was significantly more marked than that produced by propranolol. However, the SD was increased by class I drugs and E-4031, but not by propranolol. Class I drugs increased the ERP dispersion mainly by an effect on the transmural infarct zone in which the control ERP was more prolonged than in the normal zone. E-4031 tended to prolong the ERP in both the normal and infarct zones, and had a minimal tendency to increase ERP dispersion. In contrast, propranolol decreased the ERP dispersion between zones. Conduction velocity calculated by epicardial mapping was significantly decreased by flecainide, but not by E-4031. We conclude that the antiarrhythmic effect of E-4031 depends largely on its ability to prolong refractoriness without suppressing conduction. Class I drugs increased ERP dispersion and exhibited a proarrhythmic effect when marked slowing of conduction overcame their effect on ERP.