THE TURN TO TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIAL-STUDIES OF SCIENCE

被引:172
作者
WOOLGAR, S
机构
[1] Brunel University, Uxbridge
关键词
D O I
10.1177/016224399101600102
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
This article examines how the special theoretical significance of the sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) is affected by attempts to apply relativist-constructivism to technology. The article shows that the failure to confront key analytic ambivalences in the practice of SSK has compromised its original strategic significance. In particular, the construal of SSK as an explanatory formula diminishes its potential for profoundly reconceptualizing epistemic issues. A consideration of critiques of technological determinism, and of some empirical studies, reveals similar analytic ambivalences in the social study of technology (SST). The injunction to consider “technology as text” is critically examined. It is concluded that a reflexive interpretation of this slogan is necessary to recover some of the epistemological significance lost in the constructivist move from SSK to SST. © 1991, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 50
页数:31
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1958, IDEA SOCIAL SCI ITS
[2]  
Ashmore M, 1988, KNOWLEDGE REFLEXIVIT, P125
[3]  
Ashmore M., 1989, REFLEXIVE THESIS WRI
[4]  
BEST J, IN PRESS SOCIAL PROB
[5]  
Bijker W.E., 1987, NEW DIRECTIONS SOCIO
[6]   THE STRENGTHS OF THE STRONG PROGRAM [J].
BLOOR, D .
PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1981, 11 (02) :199-213
[7]  
Bloor D., 1976, KNOWLEDGE SOCIAL IMA
[8]  
Callon M, 1986, POWER ACTION BELIEF, P196, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-954X.1984.TB00113.X
[9]  
Callon M., 1980, SOCIAL PROCESS SCI I, V4, DOI [10.1007/978-94-009-9109-5_8, DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-9109-5_8]
[10]  
Campbell D.T., 1975, SOCIAL CONTEXT METHO, P184