THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PLANT ACCEPTABILITY AND SUITABILITY FOR SURVIVAL AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE POLYPHAGOUS GRASSHOPPER, SCHISTOCERCA-AMERICANA (ORTHOPTERA, ACRIDIDAE)

被引:11
作者
CHAPMAN, RF
SWORD, GA
机构
[1] Division of Neurobiology and Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, 85721, Arizona
关键词
DEVELOPMENT; FOOD AVERSION LEARNING; GRASSHOPPER; HABITUATION; PLANT ACCEPTABILITY; POLYPHAGY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/BF02025441
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
The feeding behavior of final-instar nymphs of Schistocerca americana was observed when they first encountered plants that ranged in acceptability from being eaten in large amounts to not being eaten at all. Growth and survival on the same plants through the last stadium were also studied and the results combined as a suitability index to facilitate comparison with the behavior. Although the plants that were eaten most gave the highest suitability index and those that were not eaten permitted no survival, there was no simple relationship between the amounts eaten and the suitability for growth and survival. The possibility that the insects might become habituated to plants that were initially unacceptable was investigated, but no habituation was found over a 3-day period. It is suggested that food intake is largely determined by the presence of deterrent compounds in the less acceptable foods and that nutritional differences between the plants are likely to have been of minor importance. The behavior on some foods suggests that food aversion learning may be involved. It is concluded that the variability of the insects' behavior makes it impossible to predict the suitability of a plant from their immediate behavioral responses. In the field, insects may sometimes reject foods that would be suitable for survival and development, and feed on plants that are nutritionally deficient or even toxic.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 431
页数:21
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Bernays E.A., Plant secondary compounds deterrent but not toxic to the grass specialist acridid Locusta migratoria: Implications for the evolution of graminivory, Entomol. Exp. Appl., 54, pp. 53-56, (1990)
[2]  
Bernays E.A., Relationship between deterrence and toxicity of plant secondary compounds for the grasshopper Schistocerca gregaria, J. Chem. Ecol., 17, pp. 2519-2526, (1991)
[3]  
Bernays E.A., Chapman R.F., The regulation of feeding in Locusta migratoria: Internal inhibitory mechanisms, Entomol. Exp. Appl., 16, pp. 329-342, (1973)
[4]  
Bernays E.A., Chapman R.F., The role of food plants in the survival and development of Chortoicetes terminifera (Walker) under drought conditions, Australian Journal of Zoology, 21, pp. 575-592, (1973)
[5]  
Bernays E.A., Chapman R.F., The regulation of food intake by acridids, Experimental Analysis of Insect Behavior, pp. 48-59, (1974)
[6]  
Bernays E.A., Chapman R.F., Plant chemistry and Acridoid feeding behavior, Biochemical Aspects of Plant and Animal Coevolution, pp. 99-141, (1978)
[7]  
Bernays E.A., Lee J.C., Food aversion learning in the polyphagous grasshopper Schistocerca americana, Physiological Entomology, 13, pp. 131-137, (1988)
[8]  
Capinera J.L., Host-plant selection by Schistocerca americana (Orthoptera, Acrididae), Environ. Entomol., 22, pp. 127-133, (1993)
[9]  
Champagne D.E., Bernays E.A., Phytosterol unsuitability as a factor mediating food aversion learning in the grasshopper Schistocerca americana, Physiological Entomology, 16, pp. 391-400, (1991)
[10]  
Chapman R.F., Regulation of food intake by phytophagous insects, Exogenous and Endogenous Influences on Metabolic and Neural Control, Vol. 1, pp. 19-30, (1982)