THE POLITICAL-ECONOMY OF INDUSTRIALIZATION - A COMPARISON OF LATIN-AMERICAN AND EAST-ASIAN NEWLY INDUSTRIALIZING COUNTRIES

被引:52
作者
JENKINS, R
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-7660.1991.tb00409.x
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
ABSTRACT The paper analyses the industrial performance of two East Asian (South Korea and Taiwan) and three Latin American (Argentina, Brazil and Mexico) newly industrializing countries. It argues that the better performance in East Asia is not due simply to differences in trade orientation or the degree of state intervention, but rather to the effectiveness of intervention. This is explained in terms of the relative autonomy of the state and the structuring of the state apparatus in the two regions. The historically determined class structure and the international context led to much greater state autonomy in East Asia than in Latin America. The last part of the paper shows a number of ways in which this greater relative autonomy has contributed to rapid industrial growth in East Asia in comparison with Latin America. © 1991 Institute of Social Studies
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 231
页数:35
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]  
Adler E., 1987, POWER IDEOLOGY QUEST
[2]  
Amsden A. H., 1985, BRINGING STATE BACK, P78
[3]  
ANGLADE C, 1990, STATE CAPITAL ACCUMU, V2, P211
[4]  
ANGLADE C, 1987, CEPAL REV, V31, P211
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1984, TRANSNATIONAL CORPOR
[6]   EXPORT INCENTIVES AND EXPORT PERFORMANCE IN DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES - COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS [J].
BALASSA, B .
WELTWIRTSCHAFTLICHES ARCHIV-REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 1978, 114 (01) :24-61
[7]   INCENTIVE POLICIES IN BRAZIL [J].
BALASSA, B .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1979, 7 (11-1) :1023-1042
[8]  
BALASSA B, 1986, RENEWED EC GROWTH LA
[9]  
BAN HS, 1980, REPUBLIC KOREA 1945
[10]  
BARRACLOUGH SL, 1970, AGRARIAN PROBLEMS PE, P41