EFFICIENT INSPIRED CONCENTRATION OF SEVOFLURANE FOR VITAL CAPACITY RAPID INHALATION INDUCTION (VCRII) TECHNIQUE

被引:29
作者
YURINO, M
KIMURA, H
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Asahikawa Medical College, Hokkaido
关键词
ADMINISTRATION; INHALATION; ANESTHESIA; INDUCTION OF; SEVOFLURANE; VITAL CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/0952-8180(95)00006-4
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objectives: To evaluate the efficient inspired concentration of sevoflurane for a vital capacity rapid inhalation induction (VCRII) technique with respect to induction time, characteristics, and acceptability. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Medical college hospital. Patients: 68 unpremedicated healthy adult volunteers were assigned to one of four groups in order of sequential entry of informed consent. Interventions: 3%, 4.5%, 6%, or 7.5% concentrations of sevoflurane were administered for 5 minutes (3% and 4.5%) or 3 minutes (6% and 7.5%) using a single breath technique. Measurements and Main Results: The mean induction time required with 3%, 4.5%, 6%, or 7.5% sevoflurane was 120 +/- 26 sec, 79 +/- 18 sec, 52 +/- 15 sec, or 47 +/- 17 seconds, respectively. Each induction time was significantly different from the others (p < 0.05) except for that between 6% and 7.5%. There appeared to be a direct inverse relationship between the mean induction time and the logarithm of inspired concentration of sevoflurane, but this relationship did not extend beyond concentrations above 6%. Blood pressure decreased by approximately 18% from baseline at the end of inhalation of the drug, and heart rate remained constant in all groups. Except of one subject in the 7.5% group, no coughing war observed and laryngospasm, breath-holding, and secretions were not seen in any subjects. Slight limb movement was observed in a few subjects in each group. All subjects except one in the 3% group would accept undergoing a similar procedure again. Conclusion: Sevoflurane 6% can be recommended for VCRII, but increasing the concentration higher than this does not markedly shorten the induction time and thus seems to add little benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 231
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Yurino, Kimura, Vital capacity breath technique for rapid anaesthetic induction: comparison of sevoflurane and isoflurane, Anaesthesia, 47, pp. 946-949, (1992)
[2]  
Yurino, Kimura, Induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen: a comparison of spontaneous ventilation and vital capacity rapid inhalation induction (VCRII) techniques, Anesth Analg, 76, pp. 598-601, (1993)
[3]  
Yurino, Kimura, Vital capacity rapid inhalation induction technique: comparison of sevoflurane and halothane, Can J Anaesth, 40, 5, pp. 440-443, (1993)
[4]  
Scheller, Saidman, Partridge, MAC of sevoflurane in humans and New Zealand white rabbit, Can Anaesth Soc J, 35, pp. 153-156, (1988)
[5]  
Lamberty, Wilson, Single breath induction of anesthesia with isoflurane, Br J Anaesth, 59, pp. 1214-1218, (1987)
[6]  
Buffington, Clinical evaluation of isoflurane reflex actions during isoflurane anaesthesia, Canadian Anaesthetists’ Society Journal, pp. S35-S43, (1982)
[7]  
Smiley, An overview of induction and emergence characteristics of desflurane in pediatric, adult, and geriatric patients, Anesth Analg, 75, pp. S38-S46, (1992)