IMPROVED PROGNOSTIC IMPACT OF S-PHASE VALUES FROM PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED BREAST AND PROSTATE CARCINOMAS AFTER CORRECTING FOR NUCLEAR SLICING

被引:71
作者
KALLIONIEMI, OP
VISAKORPI, T
HOLLI, K
HEIKKINEN, A
ISOLA, J
KOIVULA, T
机构
[1] TAMPERE UNIV CENT HOSP,DEPT RADIOTHERAPY & ONCOL,SF-33520 TAMPERE,FINLAND
[2] TAMPERE UNIV CENT HOSP,DEPT SURG,SF-33520 TAMPERE,FINLAND
[3] UNIV TAMPERE,DEPT BIOMED SCI,TAMPERE,FINLAND
来源
CYTOMETRY | 1991年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
FLOW CYTOMETRY; CELL CYCLE ANALYSIS; DEBRIS COMPENSATION; DNA HISTOGRAMS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1002/cyto.990120506
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Nuclear debris may significantly interfere with the analysis of S-phase fraction (SPF) from paraffin-embedded tumors. We used a background subtraction algorithm to compensate for the effects of slicing of tumor cell nuclei during preparation of paraffin-embedded specimens. DNA histograms were analyzed from 88 node-negative breast and from 78 prostatic carcinomas. Median SPFs corrected for nuclear slicing were lower than uncorrected ones in both breast cancer (7.6% vs. 5.7%) and prostate cancer (6.7% vs. 4.2%). The median SPF value in each group was used as a cut-off point in survival studies. As compared with the uncorrected SPFs, corrected SPF levels resulted in a more significant survival difference between breast cancer patients with above and below median SPF (p = 0.0014 vs. p = 0.014) and in a higher relative risk (RR) of death (4.5 vs. 3.1). The same was true for prostate cancer survival (p < 0.0001 vs. p = 0.002) and RR (5.3 vs. 3.1). Compared with the exponential background subtraction method, the sliced nuclei correction was more reproducible and could be applied in all evaluable histograms without the risk of overcompensation. In conclusion, our results support the use of background correction with the sliced nuclei model in DNA flow cytometric studies of archival tissues.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 421
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] DNA HISTOGRAM DEBRIS THEORY AND COMPENSATION
    BAGWELL, CB
    MAYO, SW
    WHETSTONE, SD
    HITCHCOX, SA
    BAKER, DR
    HERBERT, DJ
    WEAVER, DL
    JONES, MA
    LOVETT, EJ
    [J]. CYTOMETRY, 1991, 12 (02): : 107 - 118
  • [2] PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF DNA-PLOIDY IN A SERIES OF 690 PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS
    BEERMAN, H
    KLUIN, PM
    HERMANS, J
    VANDEVELDE, CJH
    CORNELISSE, CJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 45 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [3] BRAYLAN RC, 1982, CYTOMETRY, V2, P337
  • [4] EFFECT OF SECTION THICKNESS ON QUALITY OF FLOW CYTOMETRIC DNA CONTENT DETERMINATIONS IN PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED TISSUES - COMMENT
    CAMPLEJOHN, RS
    MACARTNEY, JC
    [J]. CYTOMETRY, 1986, 7 (06): : 612 - 613
  • [5] PREDICTION OF RELAPSE OR SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER BY DNA FLOW-CYTOMETRY
    CLARK, GM
    DRESSLER, LG
    OWENS, MA
    POUNDS, G
    OLDAKER, T
    MCGUIRE, WL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (10) : 627 - 633
  • [6] DNA CONTENT AND KINETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA - DETERMINED BY FLOW-CYTOMETRY AND AUTORADIOGRAPHY
    COSTA, A
    MAZZINI, G
    DELBINO, G
    SILVESTRINI, R
    [J]. CYTOMETRY, 1981, 2 (03): : 185 - 188
  • [7] COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
  • [8] MATHEMATICAL-ANALYSIS OF DNA DISTRIBUTIONS DERIVED FROM FLOW MICROFLUOROMETRY
    DEAN, PN
    JETT, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1974, 60 (02) : 523 - 527
  • [9] THE EFFECT OF CYTOTOXICITY ON DNA HISTOGRAMS
    DEITCH, AD
    [J]. CYTOMETRY, 1987, 8 (03): : 339 - 339
  • [10] VALIDATION OF A MATHEMATICAL PROCEDURE FOR COMPUTER-ANALYSIS OF FLOW CYTOMETRIC DNA DATA IN HUMAN-TUMORS
    DELBINO, G
    BRUNI, C
    KOCH, G
    MAZZINI, G
    COSTA, A
    SILVESTRINI, R
    [J]. CYTOMETRY, 1985, 6 (01): : 31 - 36